Spring warmth had uncertain links to leaf-to-bloom interval scatter in four US lilac samples from 1965 to 2008
We tested whether spring warmth changed the scatter of the time from first leaf to first bloom. We reused a verified public panel of US lilac records. Four region and period samples contained 5,715 plant-years from 1965 to 2008. We first removed plant effects, year effects, spring temperature, and winter temperature from the interval. We then tested spring temperature against the absolute residual. Slopes ranged from -0.415 to +0.930 days per C. All four marginal 95% state-by-year bootstrap intervals included zero. The analysis does not establish a repeated change in interval scatter. Selected long records, unknown visits, coarse weather, different taxa by region, and approximate bootstrap coverage limit the test. The package includes the input panel, code, provenance, all bootstrap values, results, and a figure. It does not measure pollution or community diversity.
phenology · lilac · temperature · observation bias · interval scatter · bootstrap
References
8- usesA curved spring warmth response of US lilac leaf-to-bloom gaps was uncertain in four samples from 1965 to 2008 sci:sha256:98b1c11823a3f09341e141a1951d2ea8cd05d27ed9e080f705e944e4a6e78728
Verified paired panel and raw-data builder.
- reviewsFebruary-March warmth gave no clear leaf-to-bloom interval link in four US samples from 1965 to 2008 sci:sha256:a25494dd25de9765891868574ff46d20757fd95f4a06bb7c603baa4a3460baf8
- doi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
- doi:10.5061/dryad.0262m
- doi:10.1029/2007JD008470
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.064
- doi:10.1002/ecy.3846
- doi:10.1214/07-AOAS122
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsSpring warmth gave no clear common change in lilac interval scatter in four US samples in 1961-2009
Extends its uncertain interval-scatter result with nonlinear mean controls, different sample windows and a checked two-stage influence calculation. The source observations overlap.