Similar input profiles reduced flicker response prediction error in 32 selected fly visual cell types
We tested whether anatomical input-profile similarity predicts the flicker response shape of a held-out fly visual cell type. We linked public activity and two connectome distance tables by exact type names. Label checks excluded conflicting cells and table axes. The final sample had 271 neurons from 57 flies in 32 types. Nested validation chose neighbor counts and mixture weights without the held-out response. Combined input distances reduced mean shape error from 0.8333 for a global mean to 0.6974, a 16.3% reduction. Unrestricted and broad-class label tests each had Holm-adjusted p = 0.001. Combining specimens gave an uncertain added benefit. The female-only model had error 0.7048. The gain against a training-selected single source changed sign with a stricter cell count, and its fly resampling range included zero. A post hoc check with separate training and target flies retained a smaller 7.3% gain against the global mean. Input similarity provides a useful prediction baseline in this selected sample. Mean calcium responses, few cells per type, ambiguous labels, two anatomical specimens, and shared type definitions limit inference. The result does not establish a circuit mechanism or a rule across species, regions, or behavior. Code, source hashes, small source arrays, prediction tables, null scores, resampling draws, figures, and independent checks are included.
predictive connectomics · Drosophila · optic lobe · flicker response · cell types · input profiles · nested validation · negative pooling result
References
8- usesdoi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.05.007
Source study of the activity data and deposited connectivity summaries.
- usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.pg4f4qs1j
Version 7, version ID 369181. Source arrays, ROI labels, and two input-distance summaries.
- reviewshttps://github.com/tacbox3/CurrierClandinin/tree/afa594507be380c09669c36282f3b224e9e58ae4
Inspected temporal analysis and flicker import definitions. No code was copied or reused.
- reviewsdoi:10.1038/s41586-024-07939-3
Prior connectome-constrained response prediction motivates a simple held-out baseline.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-025-08746-0
Male connectome underlying one of the deposited input-distance summaries.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-024-07981-1
Female connectome underlying the other deposited input-distance summary.
- reviewsFlyWire wiring predicts neuropil calcium correlations beyond distance in 50 flies; walking and rest coupling agree after global-signal removal; transmitter-matched wiring adds no gain sci:sha256:dcf79d60c2a2b5c231b8c34e4f8b29192c38e406e6c6946bf4a8e913edcf8811
Related regional fly structure-function result. Different activity data and spatial units; no data or code reused.
- reviewsMulti-step connectome communication measures add 0.4 to 1.9 percent of explained FC variance beyond direct wiring, distance and node effects in worm, fly, mouse, marmoset and human sci:sha256:29db0c64a2f69e86b51f20c0fe84ad9ea755316c5301ed23d308b847421db6d1
Related multi-species communication benchmark. No data or code reused.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Input synapse positions on each dendrite identify the motion direction subtype of 10,525 T4 and T5 cells in one FlyWire fly brain, in both hemispheres and both ON and OFF pathways
Campaign study of fly visual input profiles and flicker responses; different question, read before this work.