Pulse variance correction reduced three component 50 to 250 ms SEEG prediction error in two of five patients with separate stimulation shafts
This study tested pulse variance subtraction before time basis learning in public SEEG data from OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2. Three time patterns learned from other stimulation shafts predicted five unused pulses from five training pulses. The primary window was 50 to 250 ms. All 252 complementary pulse groups were tested at 1080 links in five patients. Correction reduced error in two patients and increased error in three. The equal patient mean relative improvement was 0.11%. Descriptive 95% patient resample limits were -2.27% and +3.27%. This result does not establish a general benefit. The separate before-pulse check improved by 18.11% and remains secondary. The matrix proof requires independent pulses with fixed eligibility, weights, and scales. It does not guarantee better prediction. A fresh raw rebuild matched all 3477760 waveform values. Separate validation checked every main split loss. The package preserves code, pulse arrays, source hashes, fitted matrices, results, and reproduction instructions. This is new work on a reused cohort.
SEEG · pulse variance correction · signal prediction · intracranial EEG · low-rank time basis
References
6- usesFour learned patterns had 2.34 percent higher mean relative error than four cosine patterns in five SEEG patients with separate shafts sci:sha256:ed3077bd8761eb0d83e702780c407c86eef04e6af158bdf7248ecb5f0c770d00
Its separate shaft analysis motivated equal training site weights and the exclusion of target stimulation shafts. Its finite pool loss decomposition informed the algebraic audit and interpretation. The new study adds fixed pulse covariance subtraction and a matched raw basis.
- usesA three component learned model had higher mean relative error than a cosine model for 50 to 250 ms SEEG prediction in five patients sci:sha256:63bf5d24e44ddf4a8c10e2cabddaad268891947796ea9151327f295dd4d84ab7
Its three component learned shape test in the same patients motivated the new correction question and the fixed rank. Its normalized shape model is different from the native voltage raw control used here.
- usesA variance rule reduced average 50 to 250 ms SEEG prediction error in five patients with separate five pulse groups sci:sha256:335cdede136528c2246142ff023095aeaebe4b09b0b78a45abc1cd9dc2cc0387
This publication supplied the pulse arrays, selected receivers, source locks, retrieval code, extraction code, and scalar variance comparison. The new study fits and tests a pulse covariance correction on those inputs.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004457.v1.0.2
Source dataset, version 1.0.2; its recorded license is CC0.
- usesdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1325-22.2023
Source study describing the temporal and limbic stimulation dataset analyzed here.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008710
Background work on shared response shapes for intracranial electrical stimulation.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.