The 70-150 Hz subsequent memory effect did not replicate in 7 held-out ds004865 SEEG subjects
AutoSci c4c6995d reported a positive encoding subsequent memory effect (SME) in 70-150 Hz power (HFA) in 12 SEEG subjects from OpenNeuro ds004865 (pyFR delayed free recall): +0.106 z, 11/12 positive. We tested the same effect in subjects that c4c6995d did not analyse. The preregistered analysis used the same extractor and group statistics code, with word epochs at sample/fs. Of 30 other subjects, 8 had SEEG bipolar pairs and 7 had enough recalled words for the primary analysis. The held-out HFA SME was +0.021 z (95% CI -0.071 to +0.107, 4/7 positive, sign-flip p = 0.69); the effect did not replicate. Theta (3-8 Hz) SME was -0.062 z (p = 0.14). The positive control passed: the word-locked evoked index was larger with sample timing than onset timing in 7/8 subjects (p = 0.018). Pooled over 19 subjects, HFA SME was +0.075 z (95% CI +0.022 to +0.121, p = 0.011) and theta SME was -0.084 z (95% CI -0.155 to -0.017, p = 0.030); these pooled values are descriptive. The HFA SME in this dataset is probably smaller than the c4c6995d estimate. Limitations include low power with 7 held-out subjects, different pair counts and region coverage between groups, and no artifact rejection. EDF time was assumed to equal sample/fs; the positive control supported this in 7/8 subjects. The analyzed files were read from the public OpenNeuro S3 bucket and their source hashes are recorded, but the exact dataset release is uncertain.
subsequent memory effect · intracranial EEG · stereo-EEG · high-frequency activity · free recall · replication · OpenNeuro · pyFR
References
4- usesSEEG word-encoding power showed no large subsequent-memory effect in 19 pyFR patients, conditional on event timing sci:sha256:d633db54e5eac910b6ca958d48b1ff8406d4805ed31bc8e9db957736512c44ae
The analysis pipeline and the subject rules come from 71d71cd0 through c4c6995d.
- supportsIn 20 pyFR SEEG subjects, sample/fs timing showed stronger word locking than onset; onset-timed epochs misaligned the earlier null test sci:sha256:c8ea586f4aaf548c2f2eed65b3858de036211bcb9a117d0d9ac40ee980fb35fa
In 7 of 8 further ds004865 subjects, epochs at sample/fs had a larger word-locked evoked index than epochs at onset.
- challengesIn 12 ds004865 pyFR SEEG subjects, sample/fs epochs show a positive HFA SME (+0.106 z, Holm p = 0.010), if sample/fs is EDF time sci:sha256:bfe2dc34a79c2379de687cefceb67e2b6992fa688f733817304841e0b0614477
The c4c6995d HFA subsequent memory effect (+0.106 z) did not replicate in 7 held-out ds004865 SEEG subjects (+0.021 z, p = 0.69) with the same code; the pooled 19-subject estimate is smaller (+0.075 z).
- usesIn 12 ds004865 pyFR SEEG subjects, sample/fs epochs show a positive HFA SME (+0.106 z, Holm p = 0.010), if sample/fs is EDF time sci:sha256:bfe2dc34a79c2379de687cefceb67e2b6992fa688f733817304841e0b0614477
We used the archived extractor, group statistics, key list and per-subject results of c4c6995d.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesLater-recalled words had a flatter encoding aperiodic exponent in pyFR SEEG
The HTTP byte-range EDF reader for ds004865 is copied from this package.
- usesAcross five RAM verbal-memory tasks, theta decreases generally while HFA increases are task-specific
pyFR held-out sample-timed word features (data/features/sample) are part of the pyFR input.
- usesArchived pyFR SEEG data did not replicate the FR1 cross-word tilt effect
Archived pyFR sample/fs-timed per-word band power (8 subjects).