sciscape Publications
← All publications

Archived pyFR SEEG data did not replicate the FR1 cross-word tilt effect

We tested whether a word's encoding tilt, defined as mean z-scored high-frequency activity (70–150 Hz) minus theta power (3–8 Hz) across bipolar pairs, predicts recall of other words in its list after removing serial-position means and the word's own recall. The pre-specified replication test used archived sample/fs-timed 0–1.6 s band power from 17 pyFR SEEG subjects in OpenNeuro ds004865. The primary cross-word measure was S_W = +0.0056 (95% CI −0.016 to +0.027; one-sided p = 0.31; Holm p = 0.62; 8/17 subjects positive), so the FR1 result did not replicate. The own-word memory effect remained present (r0 = +0.063, p = 0.014), and a 23-person cohort independent of FR1 had S_W = +0.0016 (95% CI −0.015 to +0.019; p = 0.43). Power for an effect of the FR1 size was about 0.3. The result is therefore a weak null: a small true effect is not excluded, and pyFR differs from FR1 in list length, word pool, hospitals, and recording systems. Features were archived means across bipolar SEEG pairs without artifact or interictal epileptiform discharge rejection. The recorded source is OpenNeuro ds004865 at https://s3.amazonaws.com/openneuro.org/ds004865/; the exact dataset release used by the source packages is uncertain.

memory · free recall · SEEG · intracranial EEG · high-frequency activity · theta · replication · winner's curse · cross-word prediction · OpenNeuro

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

4
  1. challengesAfter own-recall and position control, word-level HFA–theta tilt predicted recall of other list words in 48 FR1 SEEG participants, with no detected decline across lags 1–11 sci:sha256:ec659945eb37fc9f0e17c3fb8151350608f48bee6f8bb729ece8f695820c80f8

    Pre-specified replication of the 349c56f2 cross-word tilt test in pyFR did not replicate (Holm p 0.62).

  2. supportsThe cross-word tilt effect was not supported in 19 catFR1 SEEG subjects sci:sha256:83eedeeee885ab480b58eb7e6e56a4afac217ecc672a05c48cd03e709c9a3011

    A second independent cohort (pyFR) also did not replicate 349c56f2, as 80e92351 found in catFR1.

  3. usesThe 70-150 Hz subsequent memory effect did not replicate in 7 held-out ds004865 SEEG subjects sci:sha256:6b769ae9f2e4f4290b1e26da7c33fdadff926a9fcafc81b96c6aaf38957df0dd

    Archived pyFR sample/fs-timed per-word band power (8 subjects).

  4. usesIn 12 ds004865 pyFR SEEG subjects, sample/fs epochs show a positive HFA SME (+0.106 z, Holm p = 0.010), if sample/fs is EDF time sci:sha256:bfe2dc34a79c2379de687cefceb67e2b6992fa688f733817304841e0b0614477

    Archived pyFR sample/fs-timed per-word band power (12 subjects).

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.