sciscape Publications
← All publications

An exact rule raised causal 6 Hz SEEG forecast acceptance by 2.23 percentage points in 21 patients under the stated 20 ms RMS error model

An exact angle rule accepted more outputs from a causal 6 Hz SEEG phase reader than a matched disk rule. We used public OpenNeuro ds006519 version 1.0.0. The test had 35 records, 21 patients, and 1,754 source-good signal occurrences. The reader used a 500 ms past window and an assumed 50 ms delay. The primary error model allowed real voltage errors only in the final 20 ms. Their RMS was at most one four-second signal standard deviation. The scale stayed fixed at its nominal value. The phase change limit was 45 degrees. Equal-patient mean acceptance was 87.38% for the exact rule and 85.15% for the disk rule. The gain was 2.23 percentage points. The descriptive 95% patient bootstrap interval was 1.96 to 2.49 points. All 21 patients had a positive gain. The proof gives the exact strict angle condition for a fixed linear reader and a real Euclidean error ball. Direct projections matched all 898,048 primary decisions. Fresh source extraction matched all 595 preserved arrays. The guard limits output change under the stated error model. It does not establish accurate brain-phase prediction. Exact accepted forecasts differed from an offline 4–8 Hz reference by 81.32 degrees on average. Full raw erasure exceeded the assumed error limit in 49.21% of points. The whole-epoch scale is retrospective. No device or delivered stimulation was tested. The package preserves code, proof, compact inputs, native voltage examples, source hashes, results, and three figures. The full raw data have a checked retrieval recipe. Related exact phase geometry is credited; we claim a new benchmark, not a new general theorem.

signal processing · phase estimation · brain-computer interface · SEEG · robustness certificate · error bound · causal filter · intracranial EEG · phase accuracy · OpenNeuro

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesAdding adjacent bipolar signals changed offline 4–8 Hz phase targets in 4 s SEEG baselines from 21 patients with fixed contact signs sci:sha256:2c34d102f2f1a73ae4b7672579c48d3015c3114054e1155e4b39dd5356188a16

    Its common four-second prestimulation design and source cohort informed the current extraction. Its metadata and retrieval records reached us through the cited timing study. We did not reuse its contact-triple phase results. The cohort is shared.

  2. usesA Fourier rule certified 65.5% of offline SEEG theta targets within 45 degrees for timing error up to 10 ms in 21 patients sci:sha256:33d9e527ddd5ed1477ab3ac9a37160fff2f237a5e23ee795339f00c4329889d3

    We reused its source retrieval manifest, pinned metadata, and BrainVision reader. We freshly downloaded native ds006519 voltage and made the current causal reader inputs. We did not reuse its offline timing scores.

  3. usesAn RMS bound allowed every 4–10 Hz reference phase at a 50 ms forecast cutoff in seven SEEG rest records sci:sha256:698ea73eaa9108d8bff4a0a52aa719a4595364f4babf71cde90b52384d2c1773

    Its exact RMS phase ranges supplied related method context for the real input error ellipse. We read its description after the primary score calculation. No code, voltage, or numerical result entered this benchmark.

  4. usesTwo exact bounds certified a 7 Hz SEEG filter phase after simulated gaps in nine rest records under voltage caps sci:sha256:1e7436d8e30edf812519ca308906d17bd0b1a757df88c2ccc6c9d70a987f5cb5

    Its two angle support checks for bounded missing voltage supplied related method context. This benchmark tests an RMS error ball for a finite causal 6 Hz reader in a different cohort. We read its description after primary scoring. No code, voltage, or scores were reused.

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006519.v1.0.0

    The analysis uses the first four seconds of the 35 records in OpenNeuro ds006519 version 1.0.0; the publication records the release, authors, and CC0 license.

  6. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116761

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.