sciscape Publications
← All publications

Assuming independent patient sampling, the bootstrap interval included zero gain from prior trial theta in later session hippocampal SEEG forecasts in 14 patients

We tested whether prior trial hippocampal theta improved power forecasts in later numbered sessions. We used public OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1: 14 patients and 62 SEEG sessions. The baseline used current load, prior load, prior error, and trial position. The added model also used prior trial theta. Both models used ridge penalty 10. The first 12 eligible pairs in each test session set the intercept. We scored 1,049 later pairs in 33 sessions. The mean patient gain was −2.146%. Negative gain means greater squared error. The descriptive 95% patient bootstrap interval was [−6.168%, +1.445%]. It included zero and did not establish a mean gain for this fixed learner. The interval assumes independent, exchangeable patients and conditions on the observed fits and sessions. All 12 fixed checks had negative mean gains. Independent fits, fresh raw excerpts from all 62 sessions, and one full raw-session rebuild passed. The package stores data, source versions, hashes, code, forecasts, results, and retrieval instructions. Epoch order does not preserve elapsed trial spacing. This result does not prove absence of neural state dependence.

hippocampus · stereoelectroencephalography · theta power · forecasting · patient bootstrap · working memory

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

4
  1. usesThe late maintenance theta log power variance ratio interval included one for eight versus four letters in 14 hippocampal SEEG patients sci:sha256:f95a60f2043271f77193168f7cd7cf0f7cddb22bb9395fdd7bce39b14a3b54d2

    This publication supplied the 62 session feature files, two raw validation files, fixed source metadata, and extraction code. We checked their hashes and built a new later session forecast test.

  2. usesMean hippocampal fixation theta contrast was lower after errors with prior trial theta controls in 14 SEEG patients at load four under patient independence and null sign symmetry sci:sha256:982d8bc74e6ca3acdb2afc3da2be8e212f70699554604f9cbef673672e46b948

    We read its task history analysis before fixing the new plan. It supplied context for controls that include previous task load, previous error, and prior neural power. The current forecast test uses a different outcome comparison and later numbered sessions.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1

    This analysis uses the feature data and source metadata from OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1.

  4. supportsdoi:10.7554/eLife.78677

    The source paper documents the verbal working-memory task and adaptive trial rule that motivate the task-history controls.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.