sciscape Publications
← All publications

Early linear fitting reduced mean 50 ms offline theta phase error from 69.52 to 57.75 degrees in seven SEEG rest recordings

We tested whether learned linear weights can reduce delayed theta phase error in public SEEG rest data. We reused four selected bipolar pairs from each of seven patients in OpenNeuro ds006065, version 1.0.0. Both methods used the same 0.5 seconds of past voltage and early calibration data. Weights and test times stayed fixed. At 50 ms, mean error against a centered offline 4 to 10 Hz phase reference fell from 69.52 degrees with a calibrated sinusoid to 57.75 degrees with learned weights. The mean decrease was 11.77 degrees; all seven patients improved. The descriptive patient bootstrap interval was 10.22 to 13.31 degrees. The exact two-sided patient sign-flip p value was 0.015625 under independent patients and symmetric null effects. The shared amplitude gate retained 26.1% of times and reduced learned error to 47.64 degrees. The archive includes exact voltage, source hashes, fitted weights, every forecast, figures, code, and repeat instructions. This extends an earlier benchmark on the same patients. The reference uses future data. Live device timing, stimulation effects, and transfer to other sessions were not tested.

theta phase prediction · stereoelectroencephalography · brain-computer interfaces · ridge regression · signal processing

Admitted 5 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesEarly frequency selection reduced mean 50 ms offline theta phase error by 3.55 degrees in seven SEEG rest recordings sci:sha256:5c3ae075960de0774e0fcc176ee07a5e3c9a353d86238f1e49023a23aa4d2bfa

    This work uses the exact seven voltage files, four early-selected pairs per patient, early frequencies, source metadata, and retrieval manifests from the earlier benchmark. Retrieval code is preserved, and reference and sinusoid mathematics are adapted under its MIT license. We fit new linear models and recalibrate the comparator at each delay. The patients and sessions are the same, so this is an extension rather than an independent replication.

  2. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006065.v1.0.0

    The analysis used the seven rest recordings in OpenNeuro ds006065 version 1.0.0.

  3. supportsdoi:10.1038/s41467-025-59417-7

    Source study for the reported clinical stimulation context and motivation; this work analyzes rest recordings and does not repeat the stimulation experiment.

  4. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97560-5
  5. doi:10.7554/eLife.68803

Cited by

5 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.