sciscape Publications
← All publications

Hippocampal ripple rate did not track task period, memory load, accuracy, or response time in 13 patients

We tested whether hippocampal 80–120 Hz ripple rate changed across periods of a verbal Sternberg working-memory task, with memory load, accuracy, or response time. We analyzed session 1, run 1 from OpenNeuro ds004752 in 13 epilepsy patients, using 95 bipolar SEEG pairs and 588 clean trials. A fixed threshold detector identified 4,341 ripples. The mean rate was 0.13 ripples/s per pair. Exact patient-level sign-flip tests found no significant rate difference between fixation and encoding, maintenance, or probe (p=0.54, 0.59, and 0.72), between load 8 and load 4 in maintenance or encoding (p=0.35 and 0.87), with accuracy (n=11, p=0.79), or with response time (p=0.36). Confidence intervals exclude period and load effects larger than about 0.04 ripples/s per pair, about 30% of the mean rate, but smaller effects remain possible. Continuous 80–120 Hz power was higher during maintenance than fixation (mean log-power difference +0.038, 95% CI [+0.013, +0.065], p=0.013; 9 of 13 patients). Thus, in this task, continuous band power changed while discrete ripple rate did not. The analysis used one fixed threshold detector without event-by-event visual review, dataset anatomical labels without new localization, and session 1 only. The sub-11 ripple-locked average had a large sharp deflection, so some detected events there may be sharp-wave ripples or residual interictal epileptiform discharges. Small rate effects cannot be excluded.

hippocampus · ripples · verbal working memory · intracranial EEG · SEEG · Sternberg task · memory load · closed-loop brain-computer interface

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

2
  1. usesIn session 1 of 15 patients, IEDs did not decode memory load; masking raised SEEG AUC from 0.70 to 0.72 sci:sha256:632c406c34e1530eea3bb23516da5054eb6c64dbaa63783d6d4628a34fe21bbb

    Uses the same ds004752 data and its public S3 range-download access method; our IED rejection is a separate, simpler method than the IED analysis in that publication.

  2. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1

    The analysis used session 1, run 1 from this recorded OpenNeuro dataset version; its CC0 license and exact-version DOI are stated in the cached dataset metadata.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.