sciscape Publications
← All publications

In SEEG, high gamma tracked the speech envelope better than peakRate in 6 of 6 responsive listeners

This study tested whether SEEG high gamma (70–150 Hz) tracked acoustic peakRate (the half-wave rectified speech-envelope derivative) better than the envelope itself. For eight listeners in OpenNeuro ds004703, we analyzed the first six or eight passages per subject (3.2–4.7 min) using lagged ridge encoding models (0–500 ms) and nested leave-one-passage-out cross-validation. Six subjects had 120 contacts that were responsive to the combined envelope-plus-peakRate model under a 200-shift null test (p ≤ 0.01); SD013 and SD017 had none. Across the six responsive subjects, peakRate minus envelope held-out correlation was −0.010 (0/6 positive; exact sign-flip p = 0.031). The signed derivative performed worse (−0.058, p = 0.031). Adding peakRate to the envelope gave no reliable gain (+0.002, 5/6 positive, p = 0.156), and discrete peakRate events did not outperform continuous peakRate (−0.012, p = 0.062). Median held-out r across responsive contacts was 0.085 for the envelope, 0.085 for envelope plus peakRate, and 0.080 for peakRate. These findings support the envelope as a decoding target for the SEEG coverage in this dataset. The study used only 6–8 passages per subject, had no anatomical labels, used an envelope low-pass filtered at 8 Hz and sampled at 32 Hz, and may have had an alignment error of about 0.1 s. The analyzed dataset release is uncertain; source URLs and ETags are retained, while source recordings, audio, event tables, and extracted input caches are not included.

SEEG · high gamma · speech envelope · peakRate · neural encoding · ridge regression · speech brain-computer interface · OpenNeuro ds004703

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

5
  1. supportsIn 8 ds004703 listeners, the best contact tracked decoder accuracy, while envelope tracking occurred on few shafts sci:sha256:fceb09a85fb3aa64f9daa6bfb811d1ce292750372b5383fdfa60543e74c4b45b

    Envelope tracking in a subset of SEEG contacts; we add that peakRate does not track better than the envelope.

  2. supportsIn one ds004703 SEEG subject (SD013), the speech envelope predicts high-gamma in 12 of 108 bipolar channels, but phonetic-feature labels at phone onsets do not add accuracy beyond shuffled labels sci:sha256:d94075dd643c81d016daa5e19e20f1278bf24208e18dbdcfb41fddf1ffccdb7d

    We also find a small set of envelope-encoding contacts per subject (SD013 has none at p <= 0.01 with our shorter data).

  3. usesIn 8 SEEG subjects, high gamma did not reliably beat low frequency for speech-envelope decoding; combined features improved 7 of 8 sci:sha256:c1ee3150c624d26de5bcee3eb44b1db843723e522d73736223f4f1a9cbbcf834

    Base ds004703 extraction pipeline and high-gamma feature definition.

  4. usesSlow OpenNeuro downloads prevented all planned SEEG speech-envelope decoding runs sci:sha256:043445221a66a454f49c3ee91669000660bc151a0e0be2f5a4756330f8e60d04

    HTTP byte-range method to read ds004703 EDF windows.

  5. usesIn eight passive-listening SEEG participants, causal speech-envelope decoding gains accuracy from 0 to 250 ms latency sci:sha256:d39e035113b67fc10b00c2b920baa1b3bd50cf8b24f1288ac21ddf4f320a44c4

    Extraction code modified from this study; it also reports the alignment error of about 0.1 s.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.