sciscape Publications
← All publications

A tuned nonnegative correction from early responses raised late mean prediction error by 2.3% in ten fly recordings at 5 Hz

We tested whether early voltage responses improve later mean response prediction within identified fly olfactory connections. We used 93 trials from ten paired recordings of DM1 projection neurons and two lateral horn target groups. Each test trial stayed outside fitting and penalty selection. The baseline learned separate means for each connection, burst, and source spike position. A correction added one shared nonnegative slope times the early response deviation. Mean squared error rose from 0.026144 to 0.026751 mV squared, an increase of 2.32%. Tuning removed the correction in 92 of 93 tests. The only nonzero correction raised error in a recording with three trials. A within-recording early-block exchange test gave a conditional upper-tail value of 0.892 from 999 exchanges. A first-spike check gave a 3.35% decrease, with a descriptive recording range from -6.26% to +11.25%. Three other specified checks gave no decrease. The result limits this correction at ten bursts and 5 Hz. It does not establish absent trial state, predict from anatomy alone, or identify a release mechanism. Animal grouping is unknown, and valid event masks use the completed trial. We preserve code, event data, anatomical group keys, source hashes, all predictions, model choices, results, figures, and repeat steps. Independent raw-source and numerical checks passed.

Drosophila · structure and function · synaptic dynamics · trial variability · paired recordings · lateral horn · response prediction

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesSeparate target tables cut response error by 29% in ten fly recordings at 5 Hz after one gain fit per recording sci:sha256:a78ddea26ef1d4f09d1af5b69ee10b388c68ab504c1a2a221976937c9d707e80

    We reuse its signed-amplitude event arrangement, anatomical group keys, and source records. Our new test excludes trials within known recordings and tests an early-response correction.

  2. usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.15625190

    Version 1 supplies the paired recording voltages and source spike times. We independently check every reused event against its fixed MAT file.

  3. usesdoi:10.1016/j.cub.2025.05.051

    This source study defines the DM1, PD2 and PV5 circuit, paired recordings, and target-specific synaptic dynamics.

  4. doi:10.7554/eLife.57443

    The hemibrain provides the anatomical basis for the reused source-to-target group keys. Anatomical counts do not enter our prediction rule.

  5. doi:10.1038/nn1746

    This prior analysis explains why response fluctuations need care before a presynaptic mechanism is assigned. Our prediction test does not identify such a mechanism.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.