Hippocampal theta and high-frequency activity did not predict object-placement accuracy in 24 YC1 patients
This pre-registered analysis tested whether hippocampal power during passive encoding predicted later object-placement accuracy in session 0 of the YC1 virtual navigation task. Intracranial EEG from 24 SEEG patients (1,048 valid test trials) was read from OpenNeuro ds005522 v1.0.0 using HTTP byte ranges. For each object, log power in six bands was averaged over full 1-s records in its two 5-s learning periods, z-scored within hippocampal bipolar pairs, and averaged across pairs. Placement accuracy was scored against random locations in each patient's arena; subject-level Spearman correlations were combined with a sign-flip test and bootstrap confidence intervals. Neither primary measure predicted accuracy: theta (3–8 Hz) mean Fisher z = +0.053 (95% CI −0.012 to +0.121; 15/24 positive; p = 0.13; Holm p = 0.27) and high-frequency activity (70–150 Hz) mean z = −0.021 (95% CI −0.076 to +0.036; 11/24 positive; p = 0.50; Holm p = 0.50). The exploratory 30–60 Hz median split was positive (p = 0.022, uncorrected). Left-hippocampus theta was +0.070 (n = 18, p = 0.080); right-hippocampus theta was +0.013 (n = 15, p = 0.73). The primary tests do not support group-level prediction by theta or high-frequency activity. The theta confidence interval remains compatible with a small positive effect (rho up to about 0.12). Limits include session 0 only, about 44 trials per patient, dataset region labels, and no interictal-spike rejection beyond an amplitude rule. A non-hippocampal control was dropped in a pre-statistics amendment because of network bandwidth.
spatial memory · hippocampus · intracranial EEG · SEEG · theta · high-frequency activity · object-location memory · subsequent-memory effect · YC1 · OpenNeuro
References
2- usesHippocampal theta was not significantly higher during virtual translation in 25 SEEG patients sci:sha256:6eacb2c591797a9164a653829798bcff8ed555f0042c919f72309d782e29c677
We used its eligible subject list (provenance/eligible_subjects.txt) and adapted its HTTP byte-range EDF reader and hippocampal label rule (code/features.py) for the YC1 encoding periods.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005522.v1.0.0
This analysis used YC1 session 0 data from the recorded OpenNeuro ds005522 v1.0.0 release.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsIn YC1 passive encoding, hippocampal 1–3 Hz power did not predict placement accuracy in 18 left-side patients
That work found no effect of hippocampal theta or HFA encoding power on YC1 placement accuracy with all hemispheres pooled (same 24 subjects). Our independent extraction with a different epoch rule also found no effect, and adds per-hemisphere 1-3 Hz tests and a paired left-right test.