Median within-file relative gamma rank agreement exceeds between-file agreement at 64 s under common average reference in 36 SEEG patients
We tested relative gamma power ranks in two public interictal SEEG files for each of 36 HUP patients. We used the first 128 s, a common contact set, and common average reference. At 64 s, median within-file Spearman agreement was 0.945. Median between-file agreement was 0.869. The median paired gap was 0.077 (95 percent patient bootstrap interval, 0.042 to 0.095). The gap was positive in 34 patients. The exact two-sided sign test gave p = 1.94e-8. Between-file agreement increased from 4 to 64 s. The paired median gain was 0.157. All tested reference, band, and epoch power estimator checks had a positive median gap at 64 s. These checks were descriptive. The source does not establish the biological time gap between files. The result concerns power rank agreement. It does not test seizure localization or surgical outcome. The package contains power values for 4,260 contacts, source versions and hashes, code, results, figures, and reproduction instructions.
stereoelectroencephalography · intracranial EEG · relative gamma power · rank agreement · power estimation · epilepsy
References
3- usesCommon average reference raises median relative gamma rank agreement in two 60 s SEEG records from each of 36 HUP patients sci:sha256:3f5f9f6ae779730a7bf70359ae9ddc56a5032c2e8abdb97c0cf3c127d6082e74
This publication supplied the 36-patient cohort manifest, source metadata, fixed object versions, and MIT EDF reader. These records enabled new 128-second signal retrieval and power estimates. The new study adds duration curves and disjoint within-file comparisons.
- supportsA low frequency SEEG score had higher mean rank agreement within records than between records in 36 patients with 56 seconds of signal per sample sci:sha256:b8631f4b18302cf2891e70f90118c075291620a16f0e04a7d6a125eb4cbd65c5
The new relative gamma result adds evidence of higher within-file rank agreement in the shared 36-patient cohort. The cited report tested a different low frequency score with 56-second samples. Both reports use one cohort. This relation does not indicate independent cohort replication.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
Source dataset used: HUP iEEG Epilepsy Dataset, version 1.1.3.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThe 112-second SEEG test did not detect better onset ranking across two records in 36 patients under independence and null sign symmetry
Its duration and record rank-stability results motivated the control for signal duration. No gamma features were reused.