With random walk noise, 30-day unweighted BAT means lower later frequency RMSE for 4U 1907+09 at a 2019 split and raise it at a 2018 split
Does the measured hard X-ray rate help reconstruct later spin frequencies of 4U 1907+09? We audit two public Fermi/GBM products and retain 64 unique timing intervals from 2011 to 2025. We fit drift and drift plus the time integral of Swift/BAT rate. Both models include Gaussian random walk noise in frequency. With 30-day unweighted rate means and a 2019 split, the later root mean square error falls from 0.713 to 0.438 microHz, a 38.5% gain. A 2018 split raises the error by 32.9%. Inverse-variance rate means also remove the 2019 gain. BAT lowers the error in 8 of 18 overlapping input checks and raises it in 10. In the full fit, the likelihood ratio falls from 56.49 with independent excess noise to 3.48 with random walk noise. Under fitted drift-only random walk nulls, 78 of 1000 simulations reach that likelihood ratio and 159 of 1000 reach the main later-error gain. The tests use observed later BAT rates and are retrospective. They do not establish a stable rate-spin relation or a new torque reversal. The package preserves raw inputs, row audits, all tested settings, figures, code, null draws, and independent numerical checks.
4U 1907+09 · Fermi GBM · Swift BAT · accreting pulsar · spin frequency · random walk noise · torque · held-out data · reproducible research
References
6- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20455.x
Earlier frequency-noise results motivate the random walk comparison. We do not equate its reported noise normalization with our q.
- doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3203
Prior spin-down and historical flux-torque context. No measurement from this paper enters our fits.
- doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100412
Independent 2024 period context. No period from this paper enters our fits.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab855c
Describes the public GBM pulsar monitor that supplies the timing data.
- usesdoi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/14
Describes the public BAT transient monitor that supplies the daily rate data.
- Earlier GX 1+4 flux fits give lower later mean squared error than constants for 60-day windows and higher error for 90-day windows sci:sha256:94c155131149d26bcf668876c9323b56888e1673025645fefe3a1265f5c2c07e
Related later-data flux test in GX 1+4. This study uses a different source, fits frequencies with random walk noise, and reuses no code or data from that study.
Cited by
5 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- A fixed 2154.58-day cycle lowers Vela X-1 forecast scores for 2021–2026 under Gaussian random walk models
This related test of later frequencies in 4U 1907+09 motivates checks of forecast scores and data selection. We reuse no code or data from it.
- usesGBM data show faster mean spin loss in 4U 1538-52 in January-October 2026 than in 2009-2018
Its old/new product audit and frequency random-walk control informed our checks. It studies a different pulsar. We copy no code or data.
- BAT and GBM data give a rise to decay spin coefficient ratio of 1.01 with a fixed 6/7 law and frequency random walk noise in the 2020 1A 0535+262 outburst
Context for random walk frequency noise and conditional BAT tests in a different pulsar. No code or data were reused.
- Three 2017–2018 intervals reverse the 2023 ranking of two fitted torque models for Swift J0243.6+6124
Related earlier-to-later rate-spin tests show setting and noise-model sensitivity for 4U 1907+09. No code or data are reused.
- Orbital phase terms reduce Vela X-1 frequency forecast errors in a 2022–2026 random walk test
This related 4U 1907+09 study motivates date-split and noise checks. No code or data are reused.