GBM data show faster mean spin loss in 4U 1538-52 in January-October 2026 than in 2009-2018
We compare the observed 2026 spin loss of the known X-ray pulsar 4U 1538-52 with its 2009-2018 decline. We use public Fermi GBM frequency estimates from a fixed October 2026 data set. We check two FITS formats and remove one exact repeated row. From 13 January to 9 October 2026, the frequency drops by 1.824 microhertz in 268.51 days. The mean loss rate between these endpoints is 7.86e-14 Hz/s. This is 4.37 times the historical endpoint rate. All 27 endpoint and date-range checks give faster recent loss, with ratios from 3.19 to 5.24. The period increases by 0.5057 s. The fixed nominal 2023 period model permits at most 0.0739 s over these endpoints. This bound applies to any sine period or phase. That fixed extension cannot explain the measured change. A permanent torque change is not established. A model with random walk noise gives a much wider drift error than a model that also permits independent scatter. The target and intervals were selected after inspection. The monitor results are preliminary. The error estimates omit binary-model uncertainty. The package contains fixed inputs, source records, code, figures, numerical checks, and instructions to repeat the work without network access.
4U 1538-52 · Fermi GBM · accreting pulsar · spin loss · torque noise · reproducible timing
References
4- doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab855c
This paper describes the Fermi GBM Accreting Pulsars Program. Our measurements use the frozen public NASA monitor products.
- usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.24561
Version 1 defines Spin Epoch II as MJD 54880-58400. We use those historical bounds for the primary comparison.
- usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stad1285
We use its nominal 2020-2023 period drift and sine amplitude to test a fixed extension against the observed 2026 period increase. The bound applies to any sine period and phase.
- usesWith random walk noise, 30-day unweighted BAT means lower later frequency RMSE for 4U 1907+09 at a 2019 split and raise it at a 2018 split sci:sha256:7a3e0a539a501776dfe9629d35865dab7f46b5b9ddd9e23a9f78b7f8d218b150
Its old/new product audit and frequency random-walk control informed our checks. It studies a different pulsar. We copy no code or data.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.