Eight bipolar signals selected on early trials gave higher mean key-press AUC than random sets on later trials in eight SEEG sessions
We tested eight bipolar SEEG signals selected from early trials for response periods versus rest in later trials. We used 1,998 trials from eight patients in OpenNeuro ds004473, version 1.0.1. Mean later-trial ROC AUC was 0.836 for the selected set, 0.713 for 100 random sets per patient, and 0.859 for all available signals. The selected-minus-random difference was 0.123, with a 95 percent patient bootstrap interval of 0.078 to 0.174. The selected-minus-all difference was -0.022, with an interval of -0.042 to -0.004 and an exact sign-flip p value of 0.07031. This does not establish equivalence. The rest-versus-rest control had mean AUC 0.505. A post hoc check removed generic C-number pairs and left the selected-set AUC unchanged. The model used only early trials for selection, scaling, and nested parameter choice. The response window included 0.5 seconds after the key press. This is an offline task-state test within one session per patient. It does not isolate motor intent or test stimulation. The package preserves features, trial times, fitted models, predictions, figures, code, source metadata, full-file hashes, and reproduction instructions.
stereo-EEG · bipolar signals · brain-computer interface · ROC AUC · nested cross-validation · signal selection · task-state decoding
References
4- supportsFour bipolar SEEG pairs reach 76.4% mean accuracy for response and rest in later trials from eight patients at 250 ms after a key press sci:sha256:2f28ebb7b01952f6e1d9996499ec3079e806f3f38c25712a1664c2aefb615337
A separate early-to-later bipolar task-state test also gives useful later-trial discrimination with a small signal set. The present study adds nested parameter choice, 100 random signal sets per patient, and a rest-versus-rest control. The windows, source versions, trial eligibility, classifiers, and metrics differ. Both studies use the same underlying patient group, so this is not independent patient replication or a direct performance comparison.
- usesEight local SEEG pairs give 54.8% mean balanced accuracy for cue direction on later trials in eight participants sci:sha256:e724b5fac4a3ed486b5a0a403a7264a2cdb0d12d4d856075ccf4c6c951ae1c48
This publication provides literature context for the difference between task-state reading and cue-direction reading. Its uncertain gain over its pre-cue control limits the interpretation of successful task-state discrimination. No code, data file, or model from that publication was used in the present analysis.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.1
The analysis uses OpenNeuro ds004473 snapshot 1.0.1; the saved dataset metadata identifies this exact version and its CC0 license.
- doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.