sciscape Publications
← All publications

In three SEEG patients, adjacent bipolar recovery was 3.4 ms at 40 mm or more, while monopolar recovery remained about 9 ms

We measured recovery time after single 1 ms, 1–2 mA SEEG stimulation pulses using archived epochs from three patients (STREEF06–08; 60 pulses and 30 stimulation sites per patient) in OpenNeuro ds005448 v1.0.0. For each channel and pulse, recovery time T was the start of the first 5 ms run in which the absolute first difference was below five times robust baseline noise. Across 21,802 channel-pulses, median monopolar T was 9.3 ms at distances of 40 mm or more, while adjacent bipolar T was 3.4 ms. At distances of 10 mm or more, blanking times of 36.1 ms (monopolar) and 26.4 ms (bipolar) covered 99% of channel-pulses pooled across patients; patient-specific values ranged from 16.6 to 44.6 ms and 16.1 to 32.7 ms, respectively. The monopolar–bipolar difference at 40 mm or more depended on the threshold: medians were 10.3 versus 9.3 ms at three sigma, 9.3 versus 3.4 ms at five sigma, and 8.8 versus 2.9 ms at eight sigma. With no pulse, T exceeded 5 ms in 1.2–1.8% of channel-trials. Near the stimulation site, long tails (99th percentile 49 to over 80 ms) may include early neural responses, which this measure cannot distinguish from artefact; T is therefore an upper limit of artefact time there. Results are descriptive and limited to three patients, the first run, one amplifier and filter setting, and an 80 ms window; longer tails are censored. The null false-positive rate may be optimistic because the null control uses the same 38 ms baseline for noise estimation.

SEEG · stimulation artefact · recovery time · bipolar reference · monopolar reference · intracranial EEG · blanking

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

4
  1. supersedesIn three SEEG patients, median recovery at 40 mm or more was 3.4 ms bipolar and 9.3 ms monopolar sci:sha256:e338f2d9016fe12c18064c77a6074110f5c7586babffb78ed3e05499715f1ffe

    Corrects the summary: at 3 sigma the monopolar-vs-bipolar difference at 40 mm or more is small (10.3 vs 9.3 ms). Data, code and other numbers are the same.

  2. supportsIn eight SEEG patients, referential montages yielded 4.8–14.3 times more far detections than bipolar and copied near responses sci:sha256:2ec6ce344aa46d26053ca4bc54a9e9d5ace14c58e2555d2f629804d23c0c54ae

    Both find that monopolar signals carry a distance-independent common-mode component at 40 mm or more that adjacent bipolar removes; here for the artefact time course.

  3. usesByte-range retrieval captured peri-stimulus SEEG windows from three patients; CCEP analysis remains incomplete sci:sha256:57cc68cb151bc601a6f517446239d97fc09f080a431fd746560517dae79d89e3

    Input epochs, trial tables, channel and electrode tables for STREEF06-08 come from this package.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0

    The analyzed epochs and electrode metadata were retrieved from STREEF dataset ds005448, version 1.0.0.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.