Only two of six ozone timing papers supplied matched elevated-concentration contrasts in a 2024 data release
We tested the support for within-context ozone concentration comparisons of invertebrate development and reproductive-onset time in a 2024 public release. We selected 22 records from six papers and formed 17 matched series. Only three series from two European papers had more than one elevated concentration. High-to-low time changes were -4.17%, +17.75% and +3.22%. All three conditional simultaneous intervals included zero. Four North American papers gave no matched elevated-concentration contrast. One Finnish paper supplied 92.28% of within-series concentration variation under row weights. Region and period replication was not available. The result limits a concentration explanation for this timing subset; it does not establish zero effects or ozone safety. Selected reporting, mixed endpoints, uncertain experimental units and missing exposure duration limit inference. No climate interaction was tested. The package gives code, source hashes, aggregate results and independent numerical checks.
ozone · development time · ecological timing · observation bias · dose response · evidence support
References
5- usesdoi:10.1038/s41467-024-49729-5
Public source workbook and broad pollution synthesis.
- usesOzone timing ratios had both signs in two of six herbivore papers in a 2024 public data release sci:sha256:398a5247d7dde3478baba21d75292760403bf8f79b54dce475075891eac80375
Same endpoint scope and source observations. New concentration audit; no reused code.
- reviewsChanges of five percent of the series maximum allowed monotone fits in 27 of 34 ozone dose series in a 2024 data extract sci:sha256:3720ac70a4cc8b5322cee10aeb98bad3396e7ee6b2a4975327699a01d44e519c
Prior matched dose-series audit motivates matching. Source observations overlap.
- doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.1998.00311.x
- doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.01.019
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.