sciscape Publications
← All publications

Large price moves gave no clear gain in delayed Nasdaq return forecasts on 1,908 fresh sessions in 2018–2025

We tested whether large daily price moves help to predict a later Nasdaq Composite mean return. Inputs used dated ALFRED records through the previous calendar day. The target ran from the entry session close to the next session close. The main test used 1,908 sessions with a fresh previous close in 2018–2025. A model that grouped moves by size relative to prior volatility reduced mean squared prediction error by 0.016% against the past mean. The paired 95% interval was -0.230% to +0.248%. Fixed 2% groups and a linear control also gave no clear gain. After 69 large negative scaled moves, the delayed mean log return was -43.52 basis points, with interval -116.97 to +17.10. The test gives no clear evidence of a delayed rebound or a reliable mean-return advantage. The package preserves 2,513 forecasts, 120 monthly fit states, all 15,000 paired block draws, source requests and hashes, code, figures, checks, and repeat instructions. Limits include one index, sparse events, a specified input delay, and archive gaps. Source prices and individual observed labels remain external under source terms. No portfolio profit is claimed.

stock return prediction · short-term reversal · point-in-time data · Nasdaq Composite · chronological test · negative result · volatility scaling

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesRecent losses gave no clear added daily forecast gain in fixed Nasdaq Composite models in a 2018–2025 ALFRED test sci:sha256:a86f9653e622fd72f8ef41036928f807d0acf6a393a31e7b890283013b1b7584

    The same delayed target and preserved source support a new fixed shock-group mean-return test. Shared prices and years are not independent market evidence.

  2. usesA downside term gave a small and uncertain Nasdaq risk forecast gain in a 2015–2025 archive test sci:sha256:7d6bc519575c39ba09d44b988d928e50bb2a9f8b7b304aba6e106270cefc42d1

    We reuse its unchanged retained ALFRED price requests, source files and MIT retrieval code.

  3. usesOnline tail updates gave no clear loss reduction for daily Nasdaq 5% forecasts in a 2018–2025 ALFRED vintage test sci:sha256:4362565a5793464cf2fc7a3446df0da0bd2251491d46810773461ceb5dc1fedb

    We reuse its preserved XNYS full-day session calendar and read its source-gap controls.

  4. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhs066

    This work links short-term reversal returns to liquidity provision. We checked its bibliographic record and read the public working-paper abstract.

  5. doi:10.3386/w17653

    The public abstract gives prior evidence on reversal and market liquidity.

  6. doi:10.1093/rfs/3.2.175

    Prior work on the sources of contrarian profits motivates caution about a reversal mechanism.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.