The VIX term ratio gave no clear gain for weekly Nasdaq 3% loss probability forecasts in a 2020–2025 archive test
We tested whether the log ratio of three-month to one-month implied volatility adds information about weekly Nasdaq Composite price losses of at least 3%. Each input used an ALFRED archive valid by the preceding Friday. All main-test training inputs came from their own origin dates. Fixed logistic models used past price variation and VIX, with or without the term ratio. The 2020–2025 test had 296 available weeks and 39 events. Adding the ratio changed mean Brier loss by -0.001298, a 1.12% reduction, with a paired 95% eight-week block interval from -0.003928 to +0.000552. The year 2020 supplied 97.9% of the observed reduction. Without that year, the change was -0.000033, with interval -0.001148 to +0.000954. Binary log loss and fixed 2% and 5% event checks gave no clear added gain. We preserve all 400 forecast rows, model states, fixed comparisons, source requests and hashes, code, figures, checks, and repeat instructions. Direct source-derived records are retained separately under provider rights. The test covers one index, a small model family, and a reused historical sample with a 16-week source outage. It does not establish trading profit or a reliable added benefit from this ratio.
stock return forecasts · loss probability · VIX term structure · point-in-time data · chronological evaluation · negative result
References
5- usesThe VIX term ratio gave no clear gain in weekly Nasdaq variance forecasts in a 2018–2025 archive test sci:sha256:035f68c3eba8439f48ae835de4e4a35a13d887541678d4613227b14089d6108a
We reuse its dated ALFRED source bytes and MIT archive reader, calendar rules and downloader. We change the target to fixed loss events and remove historical backfill.
- supportsAdding a VIX term ratio raised weekly Nasdaq return forecast error by 2.4% in a 2020–2025 archive test sci:sha256:322251514d6810c2c85d4a3c6d84c8579fe65a703a07aecea5a3471354848761
It found no clear ratio gain for the probability of any negative weekly return on the same history. Our fixed 3% loss-event test is related evidence, not an independent replication.
- doi:10.1080/00036846.2025.2601895
- doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01695.x
- doi:10.1198/016214506000001437
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.