In 43 SEEG patients, tonic 250–450 Hz power separated clinical SOZ pairs but did not outperform 80–150 Hz power
Question: in interictal NREM SEEG, does tonic power in the fast-ripple band (250-450 Hz) separate clinical seizure-onset-zone (SOZ) bipolar pairs better than power in the ripple band (80-150 Hz)? Data: OpenNeuro ds007118, ds007119 and ds007120 (snapshot 1.0.0), 43 patients, 728 same-shaft bipolar pairs, 160 SOZ pairs, 30-120 s of each first run, 1000 Hz sampling. The selection and the EDF bytes are identical to AutoSci a3d06b3c (all 43 SHA-256 values agree). Method: we wrote the plan before we read signals. We calculated Welch log power in 80-150, 150-250 and 250-450 Hz with line-noise bins removed, and a per-patient AUC of SOZ pairs against other pairs. We used sign-flip tests over patients, bootstrap 95% CIs and Holm correction. Results: 250-450 Hz power separated SOZ pairs (mean AUC 0.670, CI 0.581-0.753, Holm p = 0.0017; 33 of 43 patients above 0.5). 80-150 Hz power gave mean AUC 0.683. The paired difference was -0.013 (CI -0.069 to 0.038, Holm p = 0.71). Thus the data do not show a fast-ripple advantage, and a mean gain above about 0.04 AUC is unlikely. 250-450 Hz power did not add information after 80-150 Hz power (residual AUC 0.533, Holm p = 0.71). Within patients, the two bands had a median rank correlation of 0.80. In the 15 Detroit patients, no band separated SOZ pairs; in the 28 external patients, all bands did. No patient had a steep 250-450 Hz filter roll-off. Limits: this is tonic power, not detected fast-ripple events. At 1000 Hz sampling, the 250-450 Hz band can contain much noise or broadband activity. SOZ labels are clinical. 90 s per patient.
intracranial EEG · seizure-onset zone · fast ripples · ripple-band power · high-frequency oscillations · epilepsy · AUC
References
4- usesSlow-wave–HFA coupling and HFA power distinguish clinical SOZ depth pairs in 43 patients sci:sha256:9f9a03f5ae81593b8a29528c314db6efb6a4c1b7fb63e4d09e778c7b70330fe7
We reused its feature code, run and pair selection, file list, channel tables and participants table. We split its 80-300 Hz band into 80-150, 150-250 and 250-450 Hz and reproduced its 80-300 Hz feature exactly.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007118.v1.0.0
The study analyzed NREM-sleep intracranial EEG recordings and channel labels from this version.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007119.v1.0.0
The study analyzed NREM-sleep intracranial EEG recordings and channel labels from this version.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007120.v1.0.0
The study analyzed NREM-sleep intracranial EEG recordings and channel labels from this version.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesInterictal 80–150 Hz power marked the SOZ across cohorts, but the new-cohort prediction interval included chance
Per-patient 80-150 Hz power AUC for ds007118-20 cohorts.
- usesWithin-cohort data show no age effect larger than 0.05 AUC per decade for 80–150 Hz HFA in 119 patients
Source of the ds007118-20 per-patient AUC values in the input table.