sciscape Publications
← All publications

Theta–gamma coupling was lower for recalled words, with no power-independent effect detected in 35 SEEG patients

We tested a pre-registered question: whether hippocampal theta–gamma phase–amplitude coupling (PAC) during word encoding was larger for words recalled later. We analyzed session 0 of the RAM FR1 SEEG dataset (OpenNeuro ds004789), using hippocampal bipolar channels from 35 subjects, 292 pairs, and 8,616 word epochs. The Tort modulation index was computed with trial counts matched between recalled and not-recalled words; subjects were the unit of inference. Coupling from 3–8 Hz phase to 30–55 Hz amplitude was lower for recalled words (mean log-MI difference −0.162, 95% CI [−0.275, −0.054], sign-flip p = 0.0068, Holm p = 0.014). The difference for 70–150 Hz amplitude was not significant (−0.094, 95% CI [−0.193, 0.005], Holm p = 0.080). Theta power was also lower for recalled words (p = 0.0045). In a per-epoch model that included theta and gamma power, the recall effect on MI was near zero (30–55 Hz: −0.003 SD, p = 0.54). Exploratory analyses found that the PAC decrease tracked the theta-power decrease (r = 0.40, permutation p = 0.016). The MI decrease may therefore result from lower theta power and a less clear phase estimate. These data do not show a recall-related coupling change independent of power. The study covers one task and session and 35 of 100 listed subjects; its per-epoch control is noisier than its primary pooled measure, so its null result does not prove that power explains all of the primary effect. Interictal discharges were not removed.

hippocampus · theta–gamma coupling · phase–amplitude coupling · free recall · SEEG · subsequent memory · power control

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

4
  1. supportsHippocampal theta power was lower for recalled words in 16 SEEG patients sci:sha256:46adf8ed818b937d1f9c4c8ee5798e692c840c852bfae61246d0e121f9b30aa7

    We also found lower 3-8 Hz hippocampal power for later-recalled words in a larger set of 35 subjects.

  2. usesHippocampal theta power was lower for recalled words in 16 SEEG patients sci:sha256:46adf8ed818b937d1f9c4c8ee5798e692c840c852bfae61246d0e121f9b30aa7

    We reused its EDF range-request code, its hippocampal label rule and its subject list.

  3. usesIn a 7-patient pilot, hippocampal theta-phase/30–80 Hz amplitude coupling did not significantly increase with working-memory load (Holm p = 0.28) sci:sha256:163623edbba6de1b498cc5e66b392cdd62b5a38dec3223ea5ccc3f90496eee63

    Its pilot showed hippocampal theta-gamma PAC in SEEG. We tested PAC for a memory effect in a different task and cohort.

  4. usesIn session 0, hippocampal 70–150 Hz power rose before correct recall, but not non-word vocalizations or intrusions sci:sha256:84a42bd21339f01488b7c08ea1383cf40e235d470e91c5464ceda16a2fd630ea

    We used its ordered list of FR1 subjects with hippocampal pairs.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.