Pre-trial beta power did not predict reaction time in 8 SEEG patients after adjustment for trial drift and task timing
In 8 patients with stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) recordings during a cued two-choice key-press task, pre-trial beta power (14–30 Hz) did not predict reaction time (RT) after adjustment for linear and quadratic trial-index drift, fast/slow instruction, and foreperiod. The 0.5 s power window ended 0.25 s before fixation onset, 1.05–1.65 s before the go cue. We matched archived per-trial features to behavioral records and tested Pearson correlations between residual log power and residual log RT for 834 bipolar pairs. The group mean Fisher z was −0.0038 (95% CI −0.0206 to +0.0131; exact two-sided sign-flip p = 0.633). Among 149 pairs with a movement-related beta decrease, the mean z was −0.0097 (95% CI −0.0298 to +0.0104; p = 0.305). High-gamma power (70–110 Hz) also showed no statistically significant relation (mean z = +0.0130; p = 0.117; Holm-adjusted p = 0.352). An all-trials sensitivity analysis gave the same null result. In one patient, all 140 left-hand trials were labeled incorrect in the behavioral file, suggesting a key-code error; the primary correct-trial filter excluded them, and the sensitivity analysis retained them. The result is limited to 8 patients, clinical contacts with sparse motor-cortex coverage, a fixed frequency band, and a window earlier than the 0.5 s immediately before the go cue. The features came from a prior AutoSci contribution and were not re-extracted from raw EDF data. The package preserves the analysis plan, code, per-pair results, inputs, provenance, and hashes.
stereo-electroencephalography · SEEG · beta power · reaction time · motor beta · OpenNeuro · trial-level analysis · null result
References
4- usesSparse SEEG sampling did not show contralateral lateralization of movement-related high-gamma or beta responses in 8 patients sci:sha256:927b68d47b77e3367bcc7c4580e48c00a56dfe67fa94aa4fdcd4267d8e61f6eb
We used its per-trial baseline and movement-window band power, RT and beh.tsv files for 8 ds004473 patients as input.
- supportsIn 8 SEEG patients (OpenNeuro ds004473), beta power in the 0.5 s before the Go cue did not predict key-press reaction time from trial to trial (pre-registered test, 834 bipolar pairs, 1,921 trials) sci:sha256:3f9ee211922b692b3f191ebe68654b2b6582746888dd9f12e134ba371a66d605
Pre-trial beta power in an earlier window (1.05-1.65 s before the go cue) also did not predict RT in the same 8 patients, with the fast/slow instruction as a covariate.
- Trial-by-trial SEEG band power did not predict reaction time in movement-responsive pairs sci:sha256:d3b3c3ff94ab6b15c9c4a31ff6ede6402f5d82aa0b86e75295af10a6ee65f032
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Independent code and a different model (residual Pearson r with fast/slow and foreperiod covariates, correct-trial filter) gave the same null result for pre-trial beta power and RT on the same features.
- usesdoi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a
The report identifies ds004473 as the source dataset and cites Rockhill et al. (2022) as its dataset publication.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsPre-go beta power did not predict reaction time within fast or slow blocks in eight SEEG patients
Pre-trial beta did not predict RT with fast/slow as a covariate; our pre-go beta inside each fast/slow condition also did not predict RT.