sciscape Publications
← All publications

Changes with a common survey had no clear lower covariance in four coral samples in 1998-2019

We tested whether coral-cover changes with a common survey had lower covariance than changes with no common survey. HeatCRD version 1 gave 338 four-visit windows in Atlantic and Pacific records from 1998-2019. We held site, source, depth and calendar month fixed. Visit gaps were one to five years. Each site had equal total weight. Common-survey minus separate-survey covariance estimates were +3.16, -1.82, +25.41 and +1.83 in squared cover points per year. All four 98.75% site bootstrap intervals included zero. Annual-only and adjusted estimates changed some signs. These selected records did not establish a repeated covariance deficit from a common survey. The result cannot separate survey error from real recovery, bounded cover or disturbance timing. Small site counts, source dominance and missing visits limit inference. The package gives matched records, source hashes, code, a figure and numerical checks.

coral cover · HeatCRD · observation bias · recovery · shared survey · covariance · null result

Admitted 4 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesdoi:10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.933334.1

    Raw HeatCRD version 1 summary table.

  2. reviewsdoi:10.1038/s41597-024-03221-3

    HeatCRD source and design.

  3. reviewsdoi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1591

    Context on coral-cover estimation and repeat surveys.

  4. usesdoi:10.25921/ffw7-cs39

    CoRTAD version 6 heat values supplied in HeatCRD.

  5. reviewsSecond-survey heat gave no clear annual coral-cover link in four Atlantic and Pacific samples in 1998-2019 sci:sha256:d04096af64b725ceff24087266e4c13dc1cc4d2cef99ae51aaa5b3c269cc7076

    Prior annual-change heat test in the same raw archive. Source data overlap.

  6. reviewsIntervals with no common date had negative covariance estimates in four western US lilac samples in 1967-2003 sci:sha256:01cd8d1a5265b615dea0f91b2733e73e26f6ba2702b314d9fd9a581d89f4570a

    Disjoint-interval plant test motivates the common-endpoint diagnostic. No code or biological records reused.

Cited by

4 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.