High gamma models selected on early lists gave Brier gains of 0.0123 over task models and 0.0010 over recall rates in 18 SEEG sessions
We tested later-list recall prediction in 18 public SEEG sessions from OpenNeuro ds005059, release 1.0.6. Early lists supplied model fitting and penalty choice. There were 930 later test trials. Study high gamma gave a patient mean Brier gain of 0.012253 over separately selected task models. The 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was [0.000668, 0.029781]. The exact sign-flip p-value was 0.063721. Two patients had large gains. We then added a constant control that used each patient’s early recall rate. The mean neural gain over that control was 0.001047, with interval [-0.001986, 0.003896] and p-value 0.513321. The largest task-comparison gain had no gain over the constant control. The controls were added after results. The cohort and earlier outcomes were known before this study. These results do not establish equal performance, a memory cause, or a new-patient benefit. The package contains code, trial features, source versions and hashes, all model choices and predictions, figures, and reproduction instructions.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · memory · cued recall · high gamma · Brier score · probability prediction · model selection
References
3- usesA fixed high gamma model gave no clear recall prediction gain on later lists in 18 public SEEG sessions sci:sha256:8993bf239839d217822ccc5ea36a6591d7d751e2641e08eb2b6d107f2505b38a
We used the verified trial features, labels, source recipe, and NumPy model solver. We kept the same 18 patients and later-list split. We added early-list penalty choice and controls based on early recall rates.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005059.v1.0.6
Source data: OpenNeuro ds005059, release 1.0.6, used for the SEEG signals and task records analyzed here.
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.077
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesWith behavior penalty 0.1, the 95% patient bootstrap interval for Brier gain included zero after neural penalty selection in 18 SEEG sessions
This related study selected shared coefficient penalties separately for task and neural models in the same cohort. We read it during final citation review and used its method description to state the difference and scope of our fixed behavior penalty rule. Its results did not change our model, split, or endpoint.
- usesRecall feedback raised observed mean Brier error by 0.00082 for fixed high gamma models in 18 SEEG sessions
This study uses penalties selected only within early lists and the fixed neural and task model fits. It rebuilds these choices and fits. The new update changes only intercepts after completed recall lists.