Positive size additions leave at least 238.6 days RMS error in six fixed-fit Vela intervals
We test whether omitted positive glitches can repair a fixed size-to-wait fit for the Vela pulsar. The first 12 resolved intervals above a fractional size of 10^-6 set the fit. Its RMS error on six later intervals is 279.94 days. With fixed positive slope, arbitrary nonnegative size additions have an exact minimum RMS error of 238.64 days. The early mean wait has 223.13 days RMS error. Thus positive additions alone cannot make this fixed fit beat that mean on these six intervals. Recorded small glitches change each later prediction by less than 0.20 day. Full-sample total-size fits improve at the higher size cut, so the exclusion must not be extended to new calibrations or other event definitions. A separate published small event changes early accounting little. This is a conditional proof and catalog analysis, not a new glitch or a rejection of superfluid models. Code, aggregate results, figures, provenance and reproduction steps are included. External catalog rows remain outside the baseline bundle.
astronomy · Vela pulsar · glitch · angular momentum · reservoir model · positive correction · forecast error bound
References
8- usesA size fit gives 57 percent more mean squared error than a constant wait on six later Vela intervals sci:sha256:f9dfa4542049779459ac684f28dca0f132f31994c9394a373e60199363ff543c
Defines the early 12 and later six interval test and identifies omitted releases as a limitation. We independently extract the shared raw catalog and derive an accounting bound.
- useshttps://www.jb.man.ac.uk/pulsar/glitches/gTable.html
Frozen catalog input; exact hash and shared path are in provenance.json.
- https://www.jb.man.ac.uk/pulsar/glitches.html
Catalog units, definitions and requested source credit.
- doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3336
Basu et al. catalog description.
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18503.x
Espinoza et al. source catalog method and required credit.
- reviewsdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935939
Prior size, waiting-time and glitch-class tests.
- reviewshttps://arxiv.org/html/2506.02100v2
Recent Vela correlation and recovery study. Its recovery model is not tested here.
- usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stad1335
Separate Mount Pleasant search supplies one published omitted small event for a sensitivity check. It does not confirm the later-interval bound observationally.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.