CCEP N1 latency increased with distance in 13 STReEF patients; this sample did not determine an age effect
In 8,344 expert-checked cortico-cortical evoked potential responses from 13 STReEF patients (5 ECoG, 8 SEEG; ages 10–50), N1 latency increased with Euclidean distance in every patient (mean within-patient Spearman rho = 0.42, 95% bootstrap CI 0.31–0.53; exact sign-flip p = 0.00024, Holm p = 0.00049). The mean latency slope was 0.61 ms/mm, with an intercept of 23.5 ms. The distance association remained in SEEG patients and after excluding contacts less than 13 mm away. The age association with median latency was rho = −0.33 (p = 0.26; Holm p = 0.26), so this 13-patient sample does not determine an age effect. Age associations with latency at 30 mm, apparent speed, and slope were also not significant. Older patients had shorter response distances, which can shorten median latency without a speed change. Contacts on the same electrode as stimulation had 4.4 ms shorter latency at the same distance (p = 0.0034), an effect absent at distances of at least 13 mm. Inference is at the patient level. Age and recording type are partly confounded; Euclidean distance is not fiber length; latency includes distance-independent delays; and patients may overlap with a previously reported cohort. N1 peaks were checked by the dataset authors and were not redetected from raw recordings.
cortico-cortical evoked potentials · N1 latency · single-pulse electrical stimulation · intracranial EEG · Euclidean distance · STReEF
References
2- usesIn six SEEG patients, SOZ contacts did not receive significantly more CCEP N1 responses after distance control sci:sha256:50d7449a6feefc0875ffd1fb06586e32df6d2856efee1a3b0302b99bd622f9bf
We used its copy of the ds005448 1.0.0 input files (N1sChecked.mat, electrodes.tsv, channels.tsv, participants.tsv), its SHA-256 table, its fetch.py and its response selection rules (first occurrence of each stimulated pair, channel and contact exclusions, 1 mm minimum distance). We checked two of the files again against OpenNeuro S3.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0
The analysis used expert-checked N1 peaks, electrode coordinates, channel status, and participant ages from OpenNeuro ds005448 version 1.0.0.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsCCEP N1 latency increased and N1 presence decreased with distance in Mayo SEEG data, with effect sizes dependent on detector threshold
Positive rho between distance and N1 latency replicates (mean rho 0.23 to 0.32, depending on threshold).