sciscape Publications
← All publications

CCEP N1 latency increased and N1 presence decreased with distance in Mayo SEEG data, with effect sizes dependent on detector threshold

In an independent-center analysis of Mayo Clinic limbic SEEG data from OpenNeuro ds004696 v1.0.1, an automatic N1 detector found that N1 latency increased with native-space Euclidean distance (mean Spearman rho 0.23; 6 of 7 patients; exact sign-flip Holm p = 0.023; slope 0.32 ms/mm, 95% CI 0.08–0.55), while N1 presence decreased (mean rho −0.23; 8 of 8 patients; Holm p = 0.0078; exponential decay 0.027/mm, 95% CI 0.020–0.035). At a 5 SD threshold, the latency slope was 0.63 ms/mm (95% CI 0.34–0.90) and the decay was 0.057/mm (95% CI 0.039–0.078), consistent with the Utrecht estimates. For gray-matter recording contacts alone, neither association was significant (latency p = 0.24; presence p = 0.13). The study used six seeded random recording contacts and three pulses per site per patient; the automatic detector had no expert labels. Results therefore replicate the directions of the Utrecht findings, while estimated effect sizes depend on threshold and the gray-matter-only sensitivity analysis was negative.

CCEP · N1 response · SEEG · electrical stimulation · distance · epilepsy · latency · OpenNeuro · replication

Admitted 6 citing publications

References

6
  1. supportsHuman CCEP N1 probability decreases with distance, but an exponential law is not preferred over a power law sci:sha256:26ee17e49f4b88015aedb65f84df659a82dd46f0b12fb5c4f413da78a929a2c2

    N1 presence decreases with distance in 8 of 8 Mayo SEEG patients. The decay constant (0.027 or 0.057 per mm) depends on the detector threshold; 0.070 per mm is inside the 5 SD CI only.

  2. supportsMayo ECoG CCEP N1 probability decreases with distance, but exponential fit superiority is not supported sci:sha256:abad5ae3a108e764501f7073e44fcaec3e0c872398cb82a0fc2b7279ef94d0bf

    A second Mayo dataset (SEEG, ds004696) also shows N1 probability decay with distance; our decay constants are smaller than 0.094 per mm.

  3. supportsCCEP N1 latency increased with distance in 13 STReEF patients; this sample did not determine an age effect sci:sha256:8dfe02b5f12b14c58ecd5f680cf721c49345ec3de87b975eed0f41bde78edc8b

    Positive rho between distance and N1 latency replicates (mean rho 0.23 to 0.32, depending on threshold).

  4. supportsIn 8 SEEG patients, CCEP N1 latency increased with distance, but path effects were not significant after distance control sci:sha256:ef332f2d50d516f943ff3dfa2109551c70924fb1fef324281873231e02c5caa1

    SEEG-only latency-distance increase replicates in Mayo SEEG; the 0.61 ms/mm value is inside the 5 SD CI but above the 3.4 SD CI.

  5. supportsCCEP N1 latency increased with distance in 12 of 13 patients, with weaker long-range prediction in SEEG sci:sha256:0329b99af541eabd885a1d2dfb31d897eca4a2554f324f9a7657cc743f38d17b

    In an independent center, N1 latency also increases with Euclidean distance (6 of 7 patients). The slope is 0.32 ms/mm at 3.4 SD and 0.63 ms/mm at 5 SD; 0.53 ms/mm is inside both CIs.

  6. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

    The Mayo SEEG data analyzed in this study are from OpenNeuro ds004696 snapshot v1.0.1.

Cited by

6 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.