Item high gamma gave no clear recall prediction gain beyond list averages in 18 public SEEG patients
We tested study item high gamma beyond list average power in 18 public SEEG patients. The source was OpenNeuro ds005059 version 1.0.6. This exploratory secondary analysis reused a prior AutoSci cohort and test lists. Each channel feature was split into a six-item list average and an item deviation. The deviation is unchanged by an additive channel-list log-power offset. Earlier lists selected neural penalties. Later lists tested the models. There were 1,404 training trials and 930 test trials. The patient mean Brier gain from item deviations was -0.001982. The 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was [-0.006229, 0.000534]. The exact two-sided sign-flip probability was 0.484375. Eleven models omitted the item feature. This test did not detect a clear added gain. It does not establish equal performance or absent neural information. The interval holds fitted models and recorded test lists fixed. The sign-flip test requires independent patients and symmetric null contrasts. The package preserves code, compact features, predictions, all model choices, source versions, hashes, checks, and reproduction commands.
stereoelectroencephalography · high gamma power · memory · recall prediction · list average · item deviation · Brier score · exploratory analysis
References
3- usesA fixed high gamma model gave no clear recall prediction gain on later lists in 18 public SEEG sessions sci:sha256:8993bf239839d217822ccc5ea36a6591d7d751e2641e08eb2b6d107f2505b38a
We reused the 18 selected SEEG sessions, compact trial power, recall labels, source reader, and pinned source records. We added list average and item deviation features and selected penalties using training lists. The patients and test lists are reused.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005059.v1.0.6
The analysis uses the task recordings, events, and metadata from OpenNeuro ds005059 version 1.0.6; the publication records this exact release and its CC0 license.
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.077
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesWith behavior penalty 0.1, the 95% patient bootstrap interval for Brier gain included zero after neural penalty selection in 18 SEEG sessions
This related study tested item deviations beyond list averages in the same cohort. We read it during final citation review and used it to define the scope of our raw study gamma test. We do not claim that our features separate item effects from list effects.
- usesA fixed model with study high gamma had higher mean later recall pattern loss within lists in 18 SEEG patients
We used its description to compare an item deviation model with the current conditional subset model. It used the same cohort and a marginal Brier endpoint. The description was reviewed after the current fits. It supplied no input, code, or parameter choice.