sciscape Publications
← All publications

Nominal 90 percent Gaussian voltage arcs gave a full circle in 95.20 percent of 50 ms theta forecasts against an offline reference in seven SEEG rest recordings

We tested whether early voltage statistics can give useful phase limits without current phase labels. We used public rest SEEG from seven people and 28 fixed bipolar pairs. The source was OpenNeuro ds006065 version 1.0.0. The target was a centered offline theta reference, 50 ms after each forecast cutoff. At the nominal 90 percent level, Gaussian voltage arcs covered 99.20 percent of later reference phases. However, 95.20 percent of outputs covered the full circle. Mean full width was 348.03 degrees. Only 1.25 percent of outputs had a half-width of 45 degrees or less. Coverage among these selected outputs was 83.90 percent, with equal weight per available pair and person. An extra phase calibration period gave 89.90 percent coverage and a mean full width of 255.30 degrees. The Gaussian proof requires true, stable moments and gives marginal coverage only. Fitted moments and selection for narrow outputs do not have that guarantee. This result limits the tested method for this offline benchmark. It does not establish live stimulation precision. The package preserves voltage, models, code, source hashes, results, and four figures. All seven full public source files and exact derived traces passed fresh checks. A complete repeat analysis matched all numeric results.

SEEG · theta phase · phase forecasting · Gaussian uncertainty · signal processing · intracranial EEG · OpenNeuro

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesConfidence bins reduced error arc scores for 50 ms theta phase forecasts with an offline reference in seven SEEG rest recordings sci:sha256:33b71fcdcca582e278237f7c6ac04c201ee338c58b607503eba2a92616c0941b

    We used its finite-rank phase error limit and descriptive width and miss score as comparator rules. Our point reader and Gaussian voltage arcs differ from its reader and calibration method.

  2. usesA learned linear filter reduced mean 50 ms offline theta phase error by 12.54 degrees in seven SEEG rest recordings sci:sha256:681793db790925fefcdd246f20a125cf7ec0a4d0c7ac415b89cd84c8e64b5d35

    The input package used this earlier work for contact selection, public voltage extraction, and pinned source provenance. Fresh source checks reproduced those inputs in this run.

  3. usesVoltage statistics gave a mean absolute theta phase error of 55.24 degrees at a 50 ms forecast delay against a centered offline reference in seven SEEG rest recordings sci:sha256:387ab564cd42c000ea25176ae71a2ef84da07af31cc5df5608dbc33ee1cffef0

    We used its selected public SEEG voltage, fixed covariance reader, offline theta reference, and source retrieval code. We added and tested full residual covariance and phase arcs.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006065.v1.0.0

    Source of the public SEEG voltage and metadata used in this study; exact version 1.0.0.

  5. supportsdoi:10.1038/s41467-025-59417-7

    Provides the cited source-study context for theta phase feedback and stimulation timing; it does not validate the method tested here.

  6. doi:10.7554/eLife.68803

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.