Mean shade tolerance of adult trees did not increase on 51,433 remeasured eastern US forest plots, 2002–2026, although saplings and stand age predicted an increase
Question: Do eastern US forest canopies become more shade tolerant (mesophication)? We tested this on the same plots measured twice. Approach: We used 51,433 USDA Forest Inventory and Analysis plots in 37 eastern states, measured in 2002–2010 (T1) and again 12–18 years later (T2). We followed each tree and gave each species its Niinemets–Valladares (2006) shade-tolerance score (0–5). We calculated the basal-area mean of adult trees (diameter at least 12.7 cm) and divided its change exactly into natural death, harvest, other loss, survivor growth and ingrowth. We used a 1-degree cell bootstrap for 95% intervals. We also tested two indicators: the T1 gap between saplings and adults, and the T1 relation between stand age and mean tolerance. Results: The pooled mean decreased by 0.015 per decade (−0.020 to −0.010). It increased in the North (+0.015), did not change clearly in the Central states (−0.006; −0.012 to +0.001) and decreased in the South (−0.025). Loblolly pine (basal-area share 13.5% to 16.5%) caused most of the decrease. Without it, the change was +0.002 (−0.002 to +0.007), and for hardwoods only it was −0.004 (−0.007 to −0.000). Harvest increased the mean (+0.043), but faster growth of intolerant survivors (−0.025) and intolerant ingrowth (−0.038) cancelled this. Saplings were 0.31 units more tolerant than adults at T1, but adults moved −7% of that gap, and ingrowth was 0.51 units less tolerant than T1 saplings. In undisturbed natural stands, the stand-age relation predicted +0.085 per decade; the observed change was −0.003 (−0.009 to +0.002). In oak–hickory forests the change was +0.023 in the North, +0.004 in the Central states and −0.046 in the South. Basal-area drought tolerance increased (+0.027). Limitations: the test covers about 15 years; there is one trait source; with published score errors the pooled interval includes zero (−0.037 to +0.006); with stem weights the pooled change is −0.004 (−0.013 to +0.007); regions are state groups; fire tolerance was not tested.
mesophication · shade tolerance · Forest Inventory and Analysis · community-weighted mean · demographic decomposition · stage-for-time · space-for-time · stand age · loblolly pine · oak-hickory · eastern United States · forest dynamics · remeasured plots
References
8- usesdoi:10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076%5B0521:TTSDAW%5D2.0.CO;2
Source of the shade, drought and waterlogging tolerance scores (Appendix A, Ecological Archives M076-020-A1).
- challengesdoi:10.1641/B580207
States the mesophication hypothesis; on remeasured plots in 2002-2026 the canopy shade tolerance did not increase except in the North.
- doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.061
Earlier FIA genus-level evidence for shifts toward shade-tolerant genera across periodic and annual inventories.
- doi:10.3389/ffgc.2022.991934
Earlier FIA test of the degree and rate of mesophication with Niinemets-Valladares scores; we test whether the stratum gap is realized on the same plots.
- Sapling offsets did not predict 15-year adult shifts of 118 tree species on 133,949 remeasured eastern US forest plots; a shared mortality gradient caused most of the northward adult shift sci:sha256:1c9874dcc9c0c087a26a91d8af1cc265374a65c3faeb6f19e9ff0888fcb3b04f
Same remeasured FIA plot pairs and tree-fate approach, applied to range shifts.
- On 136,744 remeasured eastern US forest plots, sapling-tree latitude offsets of 89 species predicted a southward shift, but trees moved north in 2006–2021, mainly by tree loss in the south sci:sha256:e07e902df130c7feefde73057d2c4687a46b6c4cf1390f699a52da1e2b924b4e
Earlier test of the stage-for-time indicator on the same FIA plot pairs, for latitude.
- usesOn 136,744 eastern US forest plots measured about 2006 and 2021, a shared change in total tree abundance explains the westward shift of tree species; the species-specific shift is northward sci:sha256:5a1178a3e5e938735b907edad141060115eb26a0af12002743de76c0d4cb4cb7
We use its retained FIA DataMart dataset and std15 plot-pair rule (sha256-ad8a6b2e...).
- Non-fire tree mortality on 201,087 unharvested US forest plot intervals rose 4% per decade in 2000–2025; without ash trees the national trend was zero, and stand ageing did not explain the change sci:sha256:af05f23db94f97a18fcf521ee6d0c710644a4cf87311452bf77199c9422458be
Tree mortality change on FIA plots in the same period.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.