On 136,744 remeasured eastern US forest plots, sapling-tree latitude offsets of 89 species predicted a southward shift, but trees moved north in 2006–2021, mainly by tree loss in the south
Question: does the stage-for-time method predict tree range shifts? This method compares where saplings and adult trees grow in one inventory. We tested it on 136,744 USDA FIA plots in 37 eastern US states that were measured twice (T1 2002–2010, T2 2014–2026, mean interval 14.8 years). For 89 species, we compared the T1 offset between the sapling (1–4.9 in dbh) and tree (≥ 5 in) centroids with the later shift of the tree centroid on the same plots. We used a split-half design to remove shared sampling noise, a 1° grid-cell bootstrap, and nulls for the part that all species share. Results: at T1 the saplings were on average 14.3 km south of the trees [95% CI 6.9, 21.6] (species-specific part −17.8 km). But the trees moved 5.3 km north [3.0, 7.2] (species-specific part +6.3 km). At T2, the saplings were again 14.8 km south of the trees, and the offsets at T1 and T2 had a correlation of 0.91 across species. Thus the offset is a stable pattern, not a front that the trees follow. Between species, the offset predicted the realized shift only weakly (split-half r = 0.28 [0.15, 0.34], slope 0.10). The signs agreed for 56% of species. Offsets at the range edges did not predict the edge changes. We linked 8.0 million tree records between the visits. Trees that died were 27.6 km south and trees that were cut were 14.9 km south of the T1 tree centroid. Loss thus gave +5.0 km of the shift, and recruitment gave +0.5 km. The T1 saplings that reached 5 in were 19.2 km north of all T1 saplings, so the southern sapling surplus did not become trees. The results were the same with basal-area weights, other cell sizes, stricter species rules and a longer interval (16.9 years). Limits: one 15-year interval, one region, and saplings, not seedlings. Over many decades, the result can be different. Conclusion: a sapling-tree offset from one inventory did not show the direction of the near-term tree shift. Where trees die and are cut controlled the shift.
range shift · stage-for-time substitution · Forest Inventory and Analysis · tree migration · saplings · tree mortality · recruitment · eastern United States · remeasurement · climate change · species distribution
References
6- usesOn 136,744 eastern US forest plots measured about 2006 and 2021, a shared change in total tree abundance explains the westward shift of tree species; the species-specific shift is northward sci:sha256:5a1178a3e5e938735b907edad141060115eb26a0af12002743de76c0d4cb4cb7
We reuse its retained FIA plot-pair tables (std15, longest) and its shared-change null for realized shifts; our realized northward shift agrees with its species-specific northward shift.
- challengesdoi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.013
Proposed the seedling-versus-tree latitude offset as an indicator of tree migration; on remeasured plots the sapling offset did not predict the direction of the later tree shift.
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02571.x
Compared seedling and tree edge latitudes for 92 eastern US species; we test such edge offsets against realized edge changes.
- challengesdoi:10.1111/geb.70281
Infers range shifts of US trees from life-stage ranges without a check against remeasured plots; our test finds that the sapling-tree offset did not predict the near-term direction.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118069
Seedling-versus-tree comparison of range shifts in the Pacific Northwest.
- doi:10.1126/sciadv.1603055
Realized abundance-centroid shifts of eastern US trees from remeasured FIA data.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Mean shade tolerance of adult trees did not increase on 51,433 remeasured eastern US forest plots, 2002–2026, although saplings and stand age predicted an increase
Earlier test of the stage-for-time indicator on the same FIA plot pairs, for latitude.