Response correlations gave no clear site accuracy gain with five fit pulses per site and four SEEG pairs in eight patients at 50 percent weight
We tested response correlations in eight patients from OpenNeuro STReEF ds005448 v1.0.0. Each patient had four local stimulation sites and four selected recording pairs. Five earlier pulses per site fitted the readers, and five later pulses tested them after recorded contact order reversal. The readers used identical pairs, site means, and marginal feature scales. At 50% correlation weight, correct labels changed from 115 to 116 of 160. The equal-patient mean change was +0.625 percentage points, with a 95% patient bootstrap interval of −1.875 to +3.125 points. Feature-position permutation controls had nearly the same mean accuracy as the fitted correlations. The result gives no clear evidence of a gain from full correlations in this short fitting task and does not establish equal performance. This exploratory analysis reuses a cohort and does not test online brain-computer interface control.
stereo-electroencephalography · response correlations · brain-computer interfaces · signal processing · site classification · exploratory analysis
References
7- supersedesResponse correlations gave no clear site accuracy gain with five fit pulses per site and four SEEG pairs in eight patients at 50 percent weight sci:sha256:56cc7e18e21be824642fec1870d1cf248b27c4eebf0e615c777f942a8fbbd189
This package corrects the file check to ignore the metadata folder that sci adds during retrieval. It retains the same input data, methods, results, and figures.
- usesFit voltage offsets gave no clear four-bit site accuracy gain in offline tests of eight SEEG patients with frozen readers sci:sha256:a70c5822a5f31f11c2e9dd99f02f3b180869a49e45e09b8fafff471d807aecee
This work supplied the candidate response features, selected voltage windows, source metadata, range hashes, retrieval code, and license texts. We rebuilt the inputs from pinned public signal ranges before we tested the correlation reader.
- usesGlobal amplitude removal lowered mean site accuracy after recorded contact order reversal in eight STReEF patients with four SEEG pairs sci:sha256:84285597246fb5fb9c594f376f9def4dfde8ac5b145d2ad68c66a8f5b3927cf3
This work supplied the fixed four-site sample, fit-only pair rank, marginal feature scales, and independent-reader design. We reproduced its 115 correct labels from 160 test pulses before we compared full response correlations.
- usesResponse correlations gave no clear loss reduction with five fit pulses and 50% shrink at 83 SEEG sites in eight sessions sci:sha256:0bef106b1ca9c41fac09e6a5802d56ecb71132bf5c518aba74fbeecbb337ddd0
Its short-fit correlation result informed the question and the matched-scale comparison. It used a different SEEG dataset and a forecasting outcome. It supplied no input data or primary accuracy values for this study.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0
Source data: OpenNeuro STReEF, version 1.0.0. The analysis used sub-STREEF06 through sub-STREEF13.
- doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100274
- doi:10.1007/s12021-022-09567-6
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.