Long previous waits had a larger slowing association at short current waits in 84 ds000201 v1.0.3 adults if onsets mark signals
We tested consecutive waits in the public PVT data from OpenNeuro ds000201, version 1.0.3. In 84 adults and 7,239 eligible trial triples, the previous-wait association was larger at a short current wait. The main model compared previous waits of 9 and 3 seconds at current waits of 3 and 9 seconds. The mean log response-time contrast was 0.16695, with a 95 percent person bootstrap interval of 0.13392 to 0.19950. Its ratio contrast was 18.17 percent. All fixed checks gave a positive contrast. The assigned sleep contrast was uncertain: 0.03330, with an interval of -0.02839 to 0.09480. The timing interpretation assumes that event onset marks signal time. The result is an association and does not identify a brain mechanism. The package preserves source files, all source rows, selection ledgers, code, every bootstrap sample, figures, and reproduction steps. All 177 files matched a fresh public download. An independent parser and calculation checks passed. The fresh-source run gave identical result files and figures.
psychomotor vigilance test · temporal preparation · response time · sleep restriction · trial history · OpenNeuro
References
6- usesThe response difference for preceding waits was larger at short current waits in 74 adults in the simple response task of ds003690 sci:sha256:bdd5f7ed1c0db7024f65eef5d6c77488702b00661b6a90301cccfdcd0e6d6224
This report supplied the idea of a contrast between the previous-wait associations at short and long current waits. We tested a different public PVT dataset and a continuous model. No data files or numerical estimates from the earlier auditory task entered the new estimates.
- usesLonger waits were linked to faster PVT responses in 85 ds000201 v1.0.3 adults if event clocks mark signals sci:sha256:d6aae3ecd2d377e668a9d00f1027d4c5fc3bfbcc2a7a29df66782c82796dd1e6
This earlier PVT analysis supplied the pinned ds000201 v1.0.3 source subset and manifest, the carriage-return parsing rule, adjacent-row selection, and age by assignment-order weights. We used a new current by previous wait interaction model and contrast. A fresh download of all 177 source files matched the archived hashes.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000201.v1.0.3
The analysis used the PVT event subset from this exact dataset version; all 177 source files were preserved and matched the pinned retrieval hashes.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276205
- doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01058
- supportsdoi:10.1038/s41598-017-09744-7
The source study publication describes the sleep study, age groups, and study design discussed here.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.