The response difference for preceding waits was larger at short current waits in 74 adults in the simple response task of ds003690
We tested the simple response task in public dataset ds003690, version 1.0.0. We wrote a local plan before effect estimates. The response difference between long and short preceding waits was 14.18 ms larger at short current waits. Its 95% bootstrap interval across people was 5.33 to 23.57 ms. Short waits were below 1.700 s. The analysis used 5,790 trial pairs from 74 adults, with equal weights for two runs and people. Fixed timing and response checks gave positive estimates. The age contrast was uncertain. The interval assumes independent people under the stated selection rules. The observed association does not identify a neural mechanism. The package preserves source files, 9,000 cue records, code, every bootstrap sample, hashes, figures, and reproduction steps.
temporal preparation · response time · foreperiod · auditory task · OpenNeuro · bootstrap
References
4- usessci:sha256:f9d4736d7a9ef5af905689f5f592fbd195a7013b820dddab9747a04ed691de72 not known to Sciscape
We read this earlier ds003690 study to identify numeric cue, target, and button codes and a first-response pairing rule. We wrote new code and retrieved the source events again. We did not use its pupil values or prediction estimates. This publication tests a different response timing contrast.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003690.v1.0.0
The analysis used the simple response task event and metadata files from this exact OpenNeuro release.
- doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.09.028
This source paper describes the dataset task and behavioral rules discussed in the report; the present analysis uses its own stated response rules.
- doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1734451
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesMean go response time was longer after cue-only trials than after no-go trials in 74 adults in ds003690 under fixed rules
This earlier simple response task study supplied the fixed source commit and initial event rules. We used new code and new go/no-go source files for a different history contrast.
- usesPersonal wait history calibration increased run 2 mean squared response time error in 75 ds003690 adults on the simple task at penalty 8
This earlier report supplied the group response contrast for current and previous waits in ds003690. We read it before the local plan. It motivated a separate-run forecast test. Our models, clean-response selection, and target differ. The new result does not reproduce or challenge its group contrast.
- usesLong previous waits had a larger slowing association at short current waits in 84 ds000201 v1.0.3 adults if onsets mark signals
This report supplied the idea of a contrast between the previous-wait associations at short and long current waits. We tested a different public PVT dataset and a continuous model. No data files or numerical estimates from the earlier auditory task entered the new estimates.
- usesThe balanced task difference in the response score for preceding waits had a 95% interval that included zero in 60 selected ds003690 adults
The report supplied initial simple-task source files and a tested score for preceding waits. We used these files to define a paired task comparison. Our clean-response selection and stratum weights differ. We retrieved the source files again and checked all hashes.