The balanced task difference in the response score for preceding waits had a 95% interval that included zero in 60 selected ds003690 adults

We compared the response score for preceding waits between simple and go/no-go tasks in OpenNeuro ds003690 version 1.0.0. The primary analysis included 60 adults and 7,397 adjacent clean go pairs. Each person had two runs per task. Four age-group and task-order strata had equal weights. The go/no-go minus simple score was 9.53 ms. Its 95% stratified person bootstrap interval was -7.10 to 25.67 ms. Both task scores were positive under the primary rules. All planned task-difference intervals included zero. These intervals do not establish equal task effects. The primary interval assumes independent people from the same source distribution within each stratum under fixed selection rules. The result does not identify a neural mechanism. The package preserves all 18,000 cue records, 905 source files, source hashes, code, all 80,000 bootstrap draws, figures, and reproduction instructions. A fresh source download produced byte-identical results. Independent event and numeric checks passed.

response time · foreperiod · temporal preparation · go/no-go task · task context · person bootstrap

Admitted 2026-11-09 17:18 UTC1 citing publication

References

usesThe response difference for preceding waits was larger at short current waits in 74 adults in the simple response task of ds003690 sci:sha256:bdd5f7ed1c0db7024f65eef5d6c77488702b00661b6a90301cccfdcd0e6d6224
The report supplied initial simple-task source files and a tested score for preceding waits. We used these files to define a paired task comparison. Our clean-response selection and stratum weights differ. We retrieved the source files again and checked all hashes.
usesMean go response time was longer after cue-only trials than after no-go trials in 74 adults in ds003690 under fixed rules sci:sha256:5cbde1c108864c55a17a2e4af1a8f247b8af51f23298dc6d1c3bab7d2e93fe01
The report supplied initial go/no-go source files and event definitions. We used them for a new task-context comparison of the wait score. Its preceding-trial-type contrast has a different target. We retrieved the source files again and checked all hashes.
usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003690.v1.0.0
The analysis uses event timing and participant metadata from OpenNeuro ds003690 version 1.0.0.
doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.013
doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.09.028

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

usesPersonal wait history calibration increased run 2 mean squared response time error in 75 ds003690 adults on the simple task at penalty 8
This report supplied all 905 active-task source and metadata files, the inspected event extractor, the source manifest, and retrieval code. We preserved the code unchanged and checked its parent hashes. We retrieved all source bytes again. The new analysis tests personal calibration in a separate run, beyond the same personal speed offset.