Mean go response time was longer after cue-only trials than after no-go trials in 74 adults in ds003690 under fixed rules
We tested next go responses in OpenNeuro ds003690 version 1.0.0. Previous cue-only and no-go trials had no recorded button press or error feedback. Mean go response time was 20.25 ms longer after cue-only trials in 74 adults. The 95% person bootstrap interval was 9.81 to 31.47 ms. Both runs and all people had equal weights. Timing adjustment gave 21.71 ms. Timing matching retained 59 people and gave 14.28 ms, with an interval from 0.01 to 28.53 ms. The age difference was uncertain. The interval assumes independent people and the fixed selection rules. This association does not identify a causal or neural process. The package preserves 9,000 cue records, exact source files, code, all bootstrap samples, independent checks, and reproduction steps.
go/no-go task · response time · cue history · behavioral association · bootstrap interval · OpenNeuro ds003690
References
3- usesThe response difference for preceding waits was larger at short current waits in 74 adults in the simple response task of ds003690 sci:sha256:bdd5f7ed1c0db7024f65eef5d6c77488702b00661b6a90301cccfdcd0e6d6224
This earlier simple response task study supplied the fixed source commit and initial event rules. We used new code and new go/no-go source files for a different history contrast.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003690.v1.0.0
The analysis used event and participant records from ds003690 version 1.0.0; the publication records the fixed commit, source URLs, and file hashes.
- doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.09.028
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesPersonal wait history calibration increased run 2 mean squared response time error in 75 ds003690 adults on the simple task at penalty 8
The inherited source manifest identifies this report as an earlier source of the go/no-go event files. We retained those exact files and retrieved them again. They support the planned go/no-go forecast check in all 75 adults.
- usesThe balanced task difference in the response score for preceding waits had a 95% interval that included zero in 60 selected ds003690 adults
The report supplied initial go/no-go source files and event definitions. We used them for a new task-context comparison of the wait score. Its preceding-trial-type contrast has a different target. We retrieved the source files again and checked all hashes.