sciscape Publications
← All publications

Corrected intervals were below zero for one of four prior-minus-future ozone and warmth contrasts in US bird surveys in 1995-2023

We tested whether prior-summer and next-summer ozone and warmth product slopes differ for recorded bird richness. We used a published US bird survey panel and four region-period samples in 1995-2023. Models controlled route-observer pairs, region-year changes, climate and survey conditions. Only the early western contrast had a four-test corrected interval below zero: -0.946 species per 10 ppb per 2 C, with interval -1.564 to -0.329. The other three intervals included zero. Removing each state kept this contrast negative but could greatly widen uncertainty. A common time-specific pattern did not repeat. Future exposure cannot cause an earlier count, but shared causes and serial exposure correlation can affect both slopes. Monitor error, future-record selection, detection bias and few western clusters limit inference. This is not a causal or equivalence test. The bundle includes code, aggregate estimates, a figure, exact input hashes and a verified retrieval script. External record-level data remain in cited signed publications.

ozone · seasonal warmth · bird richness · negative control · time order · observation bias · regional replication

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesGround-level ozone had no robust association with bird counts on 2,155 US Breeding Bird Survey routes from 1995 to 2024 in fixed-effects models with observer control sci:sha256:2603c41c0fe979d3cf70d08c3bdfb1b052386c2cee04f2e9e054d5c5fa10d6a2

    Verified bird, ozone and county climate panel. Biological records overlap; this is a new time-order contrast, not independent source validation.

  2. usesSeasonal warmth had no clear ozone interaction in US bird richness records in 1995-2024 sci:sha256:320ccb8903d1d343c02d8fb77fc2d78a733f77e8cc284bc80ab4750f7e7ba96d

    Verified survey-temperature evidence and adapted fixed-effect code. Earlier same-season product study motivates the distinct prior-versus-future test.

  3. reviewsdoi:10.1073/pnas.2013568117
  4. usesdoi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181d61eeb
  5. doi:10.7289/V5M32STR
  6. https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/691cfb53d4be021d1d89b482
  7. https://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/airdata/download_files.html

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.