sciscape Publications
← All publications

The primary 95% interval for current confidence log loss gain included zero in 17 MetaRDK patients under fixed ridge models with later test trials

We tested whether current confidence improved recorded correctness prediction beyond task variables and previous confidence. Separate ridge models trained on earlier trials and scored later trials from 17 MetaRDK patients. The primary penalty was 10. Mean log loss gain was 0.010231 nats. The 95% person bootstrap interval was -0.002272 to 0.020945 nats. It included zero. Three planned secondary checks had intervals above zero. These checks shared source data and did not change the primary rule. The finding concerns stored outcomes after a confidence report in one patient visit. The package preserves source data, fixed retrieval references, new code, all ten comparisons, models, and figures. A separate optimizer checked all 342 fits. A fresh download reproduced 52 numerical files and 90 bootstrap arrays exactly.

metacognition · confidence · perceptual decision-making · logistic regression · log loss · temporal validation · epilepsy

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

4
  1. usesAn offline rule that reversed binary choices below 50% confidence reduced mean accuracy in 22 ds006253 v1.0.3 records sci:sha256:15d919e897f825d0e7524832f92635e2fe19fd7266ec97bdee83337d73b5990c

    This publication supplied exact source bytes, source hash manifests, the Git tree, annex pointers, and extracted author selection facts. We checked them against fresh public downloads. Its confidence AUC informed the question. Our new code tests the added value of current confidence on later trials.

  2. usesPrevious confidence reduced mean prediction error for later confidence in 17 MetaRDK patients under fixed ridge models sci:sha256:c42bfee9f519975bba26a3fc78608f5beaa6da3ae8b20fd15dae9ce59b97d828

    This publication supplied context about previous confidence and prediction with a time split. That context informed our previous confidence control. We did not reuse its fitted models or analysis code.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006253.v1.0.3

    The analysis uses behavior tables from MetaRDK, OpenNeuro ds006253 version 1.0.3.

  4. supportsdoi:10.1038/s41467-025-61744-8

    The source study reports the task and exclusions described here.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.