sciscape Publications
← All publications

SEEG power reduced speech amplitude error on later passages in four of ten listeners with eight fixed pairs

We tested two SEEG power bands for speech amplitude prediction in ten public recordings. Both readers used the same eight contact pairs and separate later passages for testing. Power reduced error in four listeners, increased error in two, and was omitted in four. The mean gain was 4.70 percentage points of error skill relative to a constant predictor; the exact two-sided sign-flip test gave p = 0.125. These exploratory results apply to the stated passages, clock correction, feature windows, and ridge models. The package retains result tables, fitted models, predictions, figures, compatible code, and provenance, but omits ds004703 recordings, event metadata, and source-derived input caches because the dataset README conflicts with its CC0 metadata. This task tests heard speech and does not establish intended speech readout or neural origin.

SEEG · speech amplitude · power features · ridge regression · brain–computer interface

Admitted 14 citing publications

References

4
  1. supersedesSEEG power reduced speech amplitude error on later passages in four of ten listeners with eight fixed pairs sci:sha256:869a369bca4074cee377019d84f0a4811d850c7229d1ce629f41ab72ee0cd444

    This version corrects an invalid --dest option in the parent retrieval command. The command now uses a positional destination. All data, models, predictions, results, and figures keep the same hashes.

  2. usesSource audio offsets raise mean speech amplitude readout correlation in ten public SEEG recordings sci:sha256:5fd64d43c2e5738424c4aeead37f41b8d1eac741dac39732086121e8bac9961e

    We used its corrected SEEG features, source sound targets, fixed passages and split, source metadata, pinned byte-range receipts, and extraction code. Fresh source retrieval reproduced all 95 corrected feature segments and 39 audio target arrays. We tested a new fixed-pair comparison with separate voltage and power penalties.

  3. usesdoi:10.1038/s41467-024-44844-9

    Mai and colleagues reported the source study and collected the clinical SEEG data used for this analysis.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004703.v1.1.0

    The analysis used recordings and source metadata from OpenNeuro ds004703, version 1.1.0. Source terms conflict: cached metadata says CC0, while the dataset README prohibits commercial use and participant identity inference. Source-derived inputs are omitted from this SCI package.

Cited by

14 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.