Fixed eight-pair SEEG readers had higher mean sound amplitude error skill below 2 Hz than above 2 Hz in ten listeners at 400 ms delay
Ten listeners had 12.56% mean error skill for slow sound amplitude changes and −1.53% above 2 Hz. Each fixed SEEG reader used eight pairs, 10 Hz inputs, and a 400 ms delay. The fast-band 95% person bootstrap interval was −6.93% to 2.48%. Shared sounds limit this interval. Fast-only training did not establish positive mean fast skill. The contribution provides a frequency error method, results, source records, code, checks, and four figures. The result applies to later passages in this cohort.
SEEG · sound amplitude · brain-computer interface · error skill · frequency analysis · linear reader
References
4- usesSEEG power reduced speech amplitude error on later passages in four of ten listeners with eight fixed pairs sci:sha256:9d7986c2893a49c9a3d06daa806e2fe9a866569d94a0968c0542dfed56513cc9
This study inherits the ten-listener derived SEEG and sound subset, corrected source clocks, and source extraction records through the immediate parent. It keeps the same within-person earlier and later passages.
- usesTwo Hz updates reduced mean sound amplitude error skill compared with 10 Hz in ten offline SEEG readers with eight pairs, separate phase scores, and 400 ms delay sci:sha256:86884d772ab8245eb6ac9a707755da8db3627a71b2f9b8eec654cea2ad8aab20
This study uses the corrected SEEG features, source sound targets, pinned source ranges, timing records, native audits, extraction code, fixed 10 Hz reader, and stored models and predictions. It checks the parent reader and adds new sound amplitude frequency scores and a fast-loss fit.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004703.v1.1.0
The study uses the pinned OpenNeuro ds004703 version 1.1.0 source recordings and sound passages.
- doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44844-9
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesOne pair per named electrode group reduced input correlation but did not establish better sound amplitude readout in ten SEEG listeners at matched pair counts
This study uses corrected SEEG features, source sound targets, pinned ranges, source records, extraction code, and reference models. It reproduces the ten standard eight-pair models and predictions before adding new pair selection comparisons.
- usesNine fixed SEEG readers had 2.4% mean error skill for 2–5 Hz sound changes on 100 later records at 400 ms delay
We used its cosine error method and 2 Hz boundary. The present readers and later records differ from its earlier test.