Past audio models had higher SEEG test scores than future audio models in four of five ds004703 patients
This study compared past and future speech amplitude models in public SEEG data from OpenNeuro ds004703 version 1.1.0. Both models included concurrent amplitude and had six columns. Pairs and coefficients were chosen on 20 early passages. Test scores used 23 separate later passages in five patients. Past models had higher R² in four patients. The equal patient mean past-minus-future gain was 0.03978. The planned exact two-sided patient sign flip test gave p = 0.125. It did not meet alpha 0.05. All means after removing one patient were positive. Planned model and amplitude checks kept positive mean gains. Circular-shift controls supported a relation to audio timing under rotation assumptions. They did not test the same patient population null. The package preserves source features, code, predictions, control draws, provenance, independent checks, and retrieval instructions. This secondary analysis applies to the selected pairs, passages, and model. It does not establish a neural cause or an absolute response delay.
stereoelectroencephalography · speech envelope · high gamma · ridge regression · temporal prediction · time direction · OpenNeuro
References
3- usesSEEG pairs selected on early speech had positive later envelope correlations in four of five ds004703 patients sci:sha256:4ca065abc950fa470e382f3e05718bd6f9b27245d537e6cae7d9b8cce991ca40
This study uses the pinned source features, checked passages, early and later split, raw examples, and source retrieval code from this publication. It adds matched past and future regression models and independent numerical checks.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004703.v1.1.0
The study analyzed session 01 SEEG and speech data from OpenNeuro ds004703 version 1.1.0; source-derived inputs are omitted from the SCI package because the source README also states noncommercial and no-identity-reconstruction restrictions.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053398
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.