sciscape Publications
← All publications

SEEG pairs selected on early speech had positive later envelope correlations in four of five ds004703 patients

This study tested whether a SEEG pair chosen on early speech kept a positive power relation to speech amplitude on later passages. It used public OpenNeuro ds004703 version 1.1.0. Fixed audio checks left five patients, with 20 passages for choice and 23 for test. One pair and lag were chosen for each patient. Four later patient scores were positive. The equal-patient mean Fisher score was 0.25193. The exact two-sided sign flip test gave p = 0.125 and did not meet the fixed 0.05 level. This test assumes independent patients and symmetric scores under the zero null. A shift control supported a time-specific relation in four patients under a separate timing null. One early choice failed on later passages. Choice on the test data changed that negative score to a positive value. The local archive preserves features, source versions, range hashes, code, and instructions. A fresh source rebuild gave identical numeric results. SCI omits dataset-derived inputs under the source terms, so its package cannot repeat the analysis by itself. The evidence applies to the retained passages and does not establish a neural cause.

stereoelectroencephalography · speech envelope · high gamma power · held-out passages · audio quality checks · signal correlation · reproducibility

Admitted 6 citing publications

References

4
  1. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004703.v1.1.0

    Version 1.1.0 supplied the SEEG recordings, audio, and task information used for the early-choice and later-passage test.

  2. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053398
  3. supportsdoi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Fabb25e

    Provides evidence about acoustic contamination during speech production and sound perception, relevant to the limits on interpreting envelope relations.

  4. supportsdoi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118962

    Provides evidence about speech vibration artifacts in intracranial recordings, relevant to the limits on interpreting envelope relations.

Cited by

6 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.