sciscape Publications
← All publications

At English river sites in 1990–2025, brown trout density rose where nearby invertebrate pollution scores improved, but 18 other fish taxa and species richness showed no consistent link

Question: River invertebrate scores in England show recovery from organic pollution since 1990. Does fish abundance change at a site when the invertebrate score at the same place changes? A parallel SCI study (f124493a) tested fish presence; we test density with other designs. Approach: We used 42,837 Environment Agency electric-fishing surveys (May-October, 1990-2025). We matched fish sites to the nearest invertebrate site in the same WFD waterbody within 2 km. The predictor is RICT observed/expected WHPT ASPT (O/E). We used two designs: a within-site panel (14,516 surveys, 4,535 sites, site and region-year fixed effects) and a site long difference (first vs last 5-year block, median 1998-2016, region-year anomalies, catchment fixed effects, 767 sites). Results: Brown trout was the only one of 19 taxa with p < 0.01 in both designs. Per +0.1 O/E, log(1 + density) changed by +0.051 (95% CI 0.015 to 0.087) in the panel and +0.177 (0.057 to 0.296) in the long difference. Holm-adjusted p values for 19 taxa are 0.12 and 0.08. Atlantic salmon was positive only in the panel (+0.078, p = 0.03; long difference -0.001). The other 17 taxa (grayling, bullhead, minnow, lampreys, cyprinids, eel, pike, perch, stickleback) and species richness had no significant link in either design. The trout link peaked for same-year invertebrate samples, was absent for later invertebrate years, came mainly from the slow site trend, and was largest for invertebrate sites within 2 km in the same waterbody (0.16) and smaller at 2-20 km (0.04-0.06). The link is weak (r = 0.13). The O/E family-count index did not predict trout. A presence version gave trout and roach slopes close to f124493a. Without the anomaly step, calendar timing inflated the long-difference slope by 50-60%. Limitations: Data are observational. Shared local drivers (flow, habitat works, stocking, survey changes) can cause both signals. Electric-fishing catch is an uncalibrated index. Matching does not use river network distance. Conclusion: Invertebrate gains are a poor proxy for fish abundance recovery in English rivers; only brown trout shows a small, local coupling.

freshwater fish · macroinvertebrates · water quality · WHPT ASPT · RICT · brown trout · Atlantic salmon · National Fish Populations Database · Environment Agency · England · river recovery · electric fishing · fixed effects · long difference · biological indicators

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

8
  1. usesIn 1990–2025 English river monitoring, smaller gains at equal starting status cause most of the slowdown in invertebrate pollution-sensitivity recovery sci:sha256:5c20e5dd85bd18c350f5a3a6a5c207b858888c49229f6f51b56657e8d32af6df

    We use the RICT O/E WHPT ASPT site-year tables and EA invertebrate site table that this study retained (SCI shared dataset sha256-75ce6f8f73713c141f2385e31659f3042d74980f55c3f5baffb8bc2678b5dee3).

  2. supportsAt 867 English river sites, fish communities changed by about one third of the amount that the between-site relation to invertebrate ASPT predicts (1990–2004 to 2012–2025) sci:sha256:0049ed3a20117b588f8b69d1066863b4683edc5ea8d25ee1f6ad7ad483ed87fd

    Independent site-matched test with the same EA sources. With density, other designs and a presence version, we also find a positive brown trout link, no long-term salmon link, no richness link, and a roach presence slope of the same size; roach density showed no significant link.

  3. supportsdoi:10.1016/j.watres.2025.123163

    National NFPD trends found no consistent increase in pollution-intolerant fish; our site-matched test agrees for all taxa except a small brown trout link.

  4. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163107

    Evidence of invertebrate recovery from gross pollution in English and Welsh rivers.

  5. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167144

    Invertebrate biodiversity improvement in English rivers over 30 years.

  6. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02662.x

    Long-term trends in British river macroinvertebrates.

  7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2400.2007.00575.x

    European fish functional guild lists that informed our a priori tolerance groups.

  8. doi:10.1111/jfb.14119

    Electric-fishing catch calibration can bias abundance trends; a limitation of our catch index.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.