sciscape Publications
← All publications

In 1990–2025 English river monitoring, smaller gains at equal starting status cause most of the slowdown in invertebrate pollution-sensitivity recovery

Question: The recovery of river invertebrates in England has slowed. Is the cause saturation (fewer degraded sites remain) or a real slowdown (degraded sites now improve less)? Approach: We used 177,162 standard spring and autumn samples from 19,428 Environment Agency river sites, 1990-2025. A validated Python port of the RICT/RIVPACS IV GB model gave the reference expectation at each site. We compared 10-year changes in observed/expected (O/E) WHPT ASPT at sites with the same starting status in an early era (data 1990-2008) and a late era (data 2007-2025). The design is time-symmetric: each site is classified on a centre window and the change is measured from 5 years before to 5 years after that window. This design removes regression to the mean, and a permuted-years placebo gave no class change different from zero. Results: The mean 10-year gain fell from 0.049 to 0.012 O/E. Gains fell in every starting class (moderate status: 0.062 to 0.012; good: 0.045 to 0.015). The shift toward better classes explains 23% (95% CI 19-27%) of the slowdown, and smaller gains at equal status explain about 77%. In the early era, sites with larger deficits improved faster. In the late era this catch-up effect was absent, and all classes gained about 0.01 per decade. The result was similar with the same sites in both eras (19%), with presence-only WHPT (29%), with family richness (13%), and in 6 of 7 regions. A forward design that does not control regression to the mean doubled the apparent saturation share (48%). National raw WHPT ASPT rose 0.35 per decade in the 1990s and 0.07 in the 2010s, with the highest values in 2024-2025. Family richness decreased 0.29 families per decade in 2010-2025. Random-design River Surveillance Network sites had the same 2021-2025 O/E as long-term sites (0.974 vs 0.975). Limitations: The data are observational. The test does not separate less management effort from pressures that are more difficult to remove. Expectations use fixed site variables and unadjusted RICT values.

river macroinvertebrates · biodiversity recovery · WHPT ASPT · RIVPACS · RICT · regression to the mean · England · Environment Agency · water quality · long-term monitoring · saturation · freshwater biodiversity

Admitted 4 citing publications

References

7
  1. challengesdoi:10.1038/s41586-023-06400-1

    Reports that European freshwater invertebrate recovery stopped after about 2010. In England we find that gains slowed from about 2005 and that the slowdown is mostly at equal starting status, not a ceiling.

  2. challengesdoi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167144

    States that pollution-sensitive taxa in English rivers recovered to reference condition, which suggests saturation. We find that saturation explains only about a quarter of the slowdown.

  3. supportsdoi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163107

    Reports recovery of English and Welsh rivers since 1990 that slowed in later years; we confirm the slowdown with data to 2025.

  4. supportsdoi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02662.x

    Earlier analysis of long-term trends in British river macroinvertebrates and their link to water quality.

  5. doi:10.1002/ecog.08573

    Site-level trajectory clusters for 803 English EA sites; related work on heterogeneity of trends.

  6. doi:10.1101/2024.08.13.607735

    Reanalysis of the European data set that questions taxonomic resolution and trend estimates; we use family-level WHPT metrics.

  7. In 261 BioTIME 2.0 studies, start-year dominant species decline equally in time-reversed series, so the pattern is regression to the mean and not a directional loss of dominance sci:sha256:c48d2f550afbef9eab168f407fb4b2e52f819407b0525faf0d8cf8174030b58d

    Shows with time reversal that start-state class trends in BioTIME are regression to the mean; our time-symmetric design applies the same principle to classes of river sites.

Cited by

4 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.