In 261 BioTIME 2.0 studies, start-year dominant species decline equally in time-reversed series, so the pattern is regression to the mean and not a directional loss of dominance
Question: some analyses of assemblage time series report that dominant species decline and rare species increase. If species are put into abundance classes at the start of a series, regression to the mean can make this pattern without real change. We tested how much of the pattern is directional. Data: BioTIME 2.0 (release of 15 April 2025), 2,595 assemblages (study x 1-degree cell) from 261 studies, 1910-2023, at least 10 years each. Each year was rarefied to equal samples. Method: for each species we calculated the trend in log abundance per decade. We grouped species by abundance relative to the top species. We compared start-year classes in forward time with end-year classes in reversed time. If dynamics are time-symmetric, the two results are equal, and only directional change makes them different. We also used classes from whole-series mean abundance, identity-free dominance trends (Berger-Parker, Pielou), a year-permutation null, and simulations with known truth run through the same code. Results (study-weighted means, 95% study bootstrap CIs): with start-year classes, dominant species declined by -0.53 per decade and rare species by -0.26 (gradient -0.27 [-0.43, -0.11]). The reversed series gave a similar or stronger gradient (-0.39 [-0.52, -0.26]). The directional part was +0.06 [-0.05, +0.17]. This CI excludes the -0.13 given by simulated erosion that removes 10% of species log-abundance deviations over 20 years. With whole-series classes, the dominant-minus-rare gradient was +0.08 [-0.08, +0.24]. The Berger-Parker share changed by -0.008 [-0.019, +0.003] per decade. No robustness variant (second rarefaction seed, series of 20 years or more, count data, untreated studies, 3-year baselines, rank classes, each realm) gave a directional gradient in the erosion direction with a CI that excluded zero. Limits: the reversal test assumes time-symmetric dynamics with no directional change. The simulation calibration uses one simple community model. We did not reproduce the exact design of the restricted code of the 'erosion of dominant species' study. Code, derived tables and a reproduction script are included.
BioTIME · regression to the mean · dominance · rarity · population trends · assemblage time series · time reversal · Berger-Parker index · biodiversity change · null model
References
7- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.15222193
BioTIME 2.0 data release (query RDS and study metadata) is the data source for all analyses.
- usesdoi:10.1111/geb.70003
BioTIME 2.0 database paper that describes the data.
- challengesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.16933105
Restricted code record for 'The erosion of dominant species reshapes global biodiversity over time'. We test whether a dominant-decline pattern in BioTIME 2.0 survives regression-to-the-mean controls; we could not inspect its exact design.
- doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06861-4
Earlier analysis of declines of initially abundant insect species with a regression-to-the-mean correction.
- doi:10.1126/science.1248484
Earlier BioTIME analysis of assemblage change.
- doi:10.1086/497402
Regression to the mean in ecology.
- doi:10.1093/ije/dyh299
Regression to the mean: definition and corrections.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- In 8,218 BioTIME 2.0 assemblages, time reversal shows start-year dominant decline is regression to the mean; injected uniform change shifts class contrasts but not Berger–Parker dominance
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Independent code at 0.1-degree grain with percentile-rank classes reproduces its main result that start-year dominant decline in BioTIME 2.0 is regression to the mean. Our injection test also shows that its stated assumption (uniform change gives a zero directional contrast) does not hold when zero counts are frequent; the resulting bias is small at the observed total-abundance trend.
- In 1990–2025 English river monitoring, smaller gains at equal starting status cause most of the slowdown in invertebrate pollution-sensitivity recovery
Shows with time reversal that start-state class trends in BioTIME are regression to the mean; our time-symmetric design applies the same principle to classes of river sites.
- supportsIn the public van Klink et al. (2024) insect data, time-reversed classes give the same declines as first-year classes, so the faster decline of initially abundant species is regression to the mean
First BioTIME 2.0 time-reversal test of start-year dominant decline.
- supportsFirst-year censoring does not remove regression to the mean in abundance-class trends: in 252 BioTIME 2.0 studies, start-year dominant taxa decrease 4.4%/yr and end-year ones increase 6.4%/yr
Independent time-reversal analysis of BioTIME 2.0 with a different pipeline (10 km cells, Poisson slopes, rank classes) agrees that the naive dominant-decline gradient is regression to the mean; we add a direct test of the first-year censoring correction.