sciscape Publications
← All publications

A second harmonic at a fixed beat period reduces forecast errors for 19 TOI-2525 transits in 2023–2025

We compare timing curves for the two known TOI-2525 planets. We use 32 historical times and an existing verified SCI dataset of 19 later times. Weighted fits use only the historical data from 2018–2022. The beat period is fixed at 427.8211 days from published orbital periods. With all historical times, two harmonics give smaller later errors than one harmonic. On 13 later b times, the unweighted root mean square error falls from 31.85 to 18.61 minutes. On six later c times, it falls from 12.39 to 6.33 minutes. The later times cover 2023–2025. A single-wave period search from 250 to 650 days uses early data only. Its later errors are 61.46 minutes for b and 15.74 minutes for c. Alternative later flux fits retain the two-harmonic gain. However, removing one historical time reverses the comparison in one of 21 b fits and one of 11 c fits. Two harmonics also increase error for the three 2023 c events. A third harmonic gives further descriptive improvement. These results apply to the complete early sample and accepted later events. The source search for events uses a two-planet prediction. The later data were visible during study design. This is an exploratory benchmark, not a blind forecast. It supplies no new transit measurements or physical orbit solution. The package includes source hashes, code, event forecasts, sensitivity results, figures, and offline repeat instructions.

TOI-2525 · TIC 149601126 · transit timing variations · harmonics · transit prediction · TESS · reproducible benchmark

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesPublic TESS data give 19 transit times for TOI-2525 b and c in 2023–2025 sci:sha256:9007831818a72f0751cc94488536cd9905e532c5749610538bcf71e1698746c5

    This verified publication supplies all transit times, alternative later centers, and the conditional Newtonian predictions. We copy five input files without byte changes. We do not repeat its flux fits or orbit integration.

  2. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/acba9b

    Table A2 supplies the 32 historical times through the source SCI transcription. Table A3 supplies the median periods, best-fit periods, and marginal errors for the reference clock and sensitivity tests.

  3. doi:10.17909/T9-NMC8-F686

    The reused later transit times were measured from public TESS data. This study does not download or fit those light curves again.

  4. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/122

    This work gives physical context for slow transit timing waves near first-order orbital period ratios. Our curve is an empirical predictor.

  5. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557512

    This TESS survey uses established one- and two-harmonic timing models. We make no claim to introduce harmonic fitting.

  6. Orbital beat periods gave lower mean later error than fitted periods in 146 Kepler records without model selection sci:sha256:8d2a4651117dd12b4be2c8f8aea1249134df0adca09aac2875b8a0090ae3f362

    This prior Kepler benchmark compares fixed beat periods with fitted periods. The current comparison uses one named TESS system and tests harmonic shape.

  7. A fit with two harmonics to 31 early TOI-2202 b times has a 42-minute RMS error on 18 later transits sci:sha256:0c5780683b011849f6f459cc9e1f6d1fd5a8d4e1e3f444f4d5809fdb28a56654

    This prior TOI-2202 study gives a related system-specific harmonic forecast test. The current contribution uses the distinct TOI-2525 timing sample.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.