With unrestricted positive cell gains at DC, mean responses from one fixed connected passive gap model can match any positive matrix
We tested whether averaging responses can create apparent direction in a passive electrical circuit. At direct current (DC), each condition used a fixed positive symmetric transfer matrix with separate positive source and readout gains. We proved that n gain conditions can reproduce any strictly positive n by n response matrix as their equal arithmetic mean. The circuit stays fixed. If each gain changes by at most a factor K and every entry uses the same condition weights, a reciprocal reference exists within a factor (K+1)^2/(4K). The scalar bound is sharp; we do not claim a sharp network bound. A matched geometric mean preserves the reciprocal loop condition for arbitrary positive gains, even when the symmetric circuit changes. A three-condition test on a 296-cell Cook C. elegans gap model used twofold gains. Its arithmetic mean had loop product ratio 1.728 and minimum reciprocal change factor 1.09545. Its matched geometric mean had factor one. Unequal sampling broke both pooling rules. A full 296-cell construction reproduced a chosen positive target with maximum relative error 1.94e-15, but used unrestricted gain ranges near 1e31. Exact rational checks, independent solver checks, and 100 seeded software designs passed. All functional responses are synthetic. We did not fit animal recordings or identify the cause of an empirical loop signal. The package preserves proofs, code, anatomical provenance, complete numerical witnesses, controls, figures, and repeat instructions.
electrical synapses · reciprocal transfer · connectome · response averaging · cell gains · Caenorhabditis elegans · geometric mean · identifiability
References
8- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-019-1352-7
Anatomical gap counts from the hermaphrodite workbook corrected in July 2020 define the full passive model. Counts are EM sections, not measured conductances.
- usesAnatomical paths reduced mean calcium prediction error in 103 C. elegans animals excluded from training sci:sha256:a10115ec5ae0e7b414c52276d1b6d39d2529e9168b00f3fed9ac6719192f7206
We reuse its canonical neuronal names. An independent source-workbook extraction matches its verified 302-cell gap matrix exactly. No functional data from this publication enter the study.
- usesWith free cell gains, changes within 1.25 sample standard errors allowed a reciprocal fit to 109 selected C. elegans response pairs sci:sha256:cd8e2262408cdd13ad3f6faa138f2b822a795ac9f993a1571ead9954cd16076a
We use the fixed-gain reciprocal change-factor diagnostic. We extend its scope analysis to changing gains, condition averaging, a bounded gain result, and matched geometric pooling.
- At Laplace rates of 0.2 and 1 per second, removing four of 106 C. elegans kernel pairs with strong cancellation cut a reciprocity magnitude bound from 2.60 to 1.39 sci:sha256:d6592a9b70ebda3478fcb41c88b82653f072e54539897371fe9c9f1777827f8b
This study tests dynamic reciprocity and notes that means of different states need not follow one reciprocal model. We give exact averaging results with fixed and changing gains.
- usesdoi:10.1007/s10107-010-0419-x
Established graph potential and loop decomposition provide the basis of the reciprocal diagnostic. We do not claim a new graph decomposition.
- doi:10.1007/s00422-016-0681-y
Prior theory of passive electrical neuronal response functions gives the biological model context.
- doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06683-4
Neural stimulation atlas motivates tests of anatomical structure against measured function. Its animal responses are not fit here.
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2106.10037
Prior sharp bounds for bounded covariance give mathematical context for the scalar product-to-means inequality. We provide a direct proof of the inequality used in this study.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesWith fixed means and independent errors of finite variance, repeat products give unbiased squared three-cell loop estimates
Its gain mixture result motivates the fixed-state assumption and the new repeated-event assay.