HFO time occupancy gave 0.31 percentage points lower mean list agreement than counts with equal weights for seven SEEG patients
We compared HFO counts with marked time in 135 five-minute SEEG sleep records from seven patients. HFO means high-frequency oscillation. SEEG means stereoelectroencephalography. We used fixed bipolar pair sets and fractional membership for tied scores. Patients had equal weight. Mean between-record list agreement was 70.28 percent for time occupancy and 70.59 percent for count. The mean difference was -0.31 percentage points. The descriptive 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was -3.34 to +3.16 points. The exact two-sided patient sign-flip test gave p = 0.859375. Two patient differences were positive and five were negative. This sample does not establish a repeatability gain or equal repeatability. A separate within-record duration exchange model gave an upper-tail value of 0.1307 from 9,999 draws. This result assumes exchangeable durations among marks within each record. Duration changed list membership in 71 records, but it did not produce a clear mean repeatability gain. Independent decimal, interval, tie, score, and exact inference checks passed. A full repeat reproduced all 15 numerical output files byte for byte. Fresh retrieval matched all 185 public source event tables. The package contains source annotations, provenance, code, results, figures, and offline repeat instructions. This is a new analysis of an existing cohort. It does not establish clinical benefit.
high-frequency oscillations · stereoelectroencephalography · time occupancy · event duration · channel list repeatability · interictal sleep · duration exchange
References
6- usessci:sha256:74e22fdac1f333c2b0ddb2a290f381a26fb548555b4502c3a28eb34f5d53248c not known to Sciscape
The preserved public source archive originated in this study. Its count variation result informed the duration question. All new measures were calculated from the source event tables.
- usessci:sha256:a22be20f9664505ea33080cefb407ff7b6665b5b75e6cc0193ba4ef160713581 not known to Sciscape
Its record audit and contact alias functions are retained through the retrieved source package. They established the fixed SEEG pair sets and recording lengths. Its list stability work informed the separate-record comparison.
- usesSpread 60-second samples gave 0.48 percentage points higher mean overlapping HFO list agreement in 135 SEEG sleep records, with equal weights for seven patients sci:sha256:405e297fae9e0c153d7253bdd497f1e879661f2735443f62f739f452f3258939
We retrieved its source archive, metadata reader, and retrieval tools. Its count stability result informed the question. We calculated every duration score from source annotations and used no earlier score table.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003498.v1.1.1
The analysis uses the released event annotations from OpenNeuro ds003498, version 1.1.1.
- usesdoi:10.6080/K06Q1VD5
The archived dataset provenance identifies this as the original CRCNS source dataset DOI.
- doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13064-1
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesDuration weighting changed STE channel lists without a clear SOZ rank gain in 18 SEEG sleep records
Its count and duration comparison informed the present question. The present study uses a different dataset and tests SOZ ranking. No analytical data were copied from that study.
- usesMarked time gave no clear mean STE list agreement gain in 18 SEEG sleep records with independent uniform cutoff choices and equal patient weights
This earlier study supplied the count-versus-marked-time list agreement question and independent uniform cutoff-choice estimand. We tested a different cohort and two consecutive 30 minute windows. It is not an exact replication of its multiple five-minute-record endpoint.