sciscape Publications
← All publications

A fixed heartbeat phase model had negative mean beta power skill after linear ECG subtraction in nine adult SEEG rest records

The fixed heartbeat phase model did not improve mean prediction of later beta power after linear ECG subtraction. We used nine adult rest records from OpenNeuro ds003688 version 1.0.7, with 578 good SEEG contacts. The target was log power from 13 to 30 Hz. Separate 50 second blocks supplied training and test targets. Mean skill was -0.005868. Mean normalized error was 0.59% higher than error from the training mean. The sole primary comparison with 999 circular timing controls gave an upper tail value of 0.070. This value was above the saved 0.05 threshold. The comparison assumes independent patients and circular timing exchangeability conditional on fixed targets. The result does not prove absence of heartbeat structure or identify its source. The package preserves inputs, source identities, code, coefficients, control scores, detector outputs, and reproduction instructions. All 27 numerical result files passed an exact repeat check. One fresh raw range and its reduced input matched the source hashes.

heartbeat phase · beta power · SEEG · ECG subtraction · intracranial electrophysiology · prediction skill · circular timing controls

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

4
  1. usesBipolar reference changed linear ECG prediction skill in both directions compared with common average reference in nine adult rest SEEG records sci:sha256:0ab9025de2c32e339ac12889a218c711c42b734b2f0263ba9eb03b05afa008c3

    Used its verified reduced SEEG and ECG inputs for nine adult rest records. Used its metadata selection, retrieval code, source identities, and reference pair rule. Tested a new beta power target with a fixed heartbeat phase model. This is the same patient sample as the source voltage study.

  2. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003688.v1.0.7

    The analyzed reduced inputs are from OpenNeuro ds003688 version 1.0.7.

  3. doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01173-0
  4. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.042

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.